The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewRon Paul Archive
A Big Beautiful Bill for the Military-Industrial Complex
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
List of Bookmarks

The US Senate worked through the weekend on the “Big Beautiful Bill.” The goal was to pass it quickly to ensure the House will then pass it and send it to President Trump’s desk before the July 4th holiday.

However, disagreements among Republican Senators over reductions in spending on programs including Medicaid and food stamps as well as language in the bill eliminating “clean energy” tax credits were preventing Senate Republican leadership from getting enough votes to pass the bill.

Also, some Republicans disagree with other Republicans in both the House and Senate on increasing the state and local tax (SALT) deduction. Many conservatives see this income tax deduction as encouraging states to maintain high taxes to fund big governments.

One item in the BBB that few Republicans are objecting to is the bill’s increase in military spending. The House version of the BBB added 150 billion dollars to the Pentagon’s already bloated budget. The Senate bill gave the military-industrial complex 156 billion dollars.

Increasing military spending contradicts President Trump’s promise to stop wasting money on endless wars that have nothing to do with ensuring the security of the American people.

Some of the BBB’s military spending will be used to put troops on the border. I support strengthening border security. However, I do not support using the military for domestic law enforcement, which includes enforcing immigration laws. Soldiers are trained to view people as potential enemies, not as innocent civilians to be protected. Introducing this mindset into domestic law enforcement will lead to abuses of liberty.

Increasing spending on militarism while cutting spending on programs that help low-income Americans is bad politics and bad policy. Polls show that the majority of Americans, including many Republicans, do not support overseas intervention.

The growing opposition to our hyper-interventionist foreign policy is easy to understand. The US has engaged in numerous military actions in many countries including Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria since the beginning of the 21st century. The American people pay for this militarism in several ways. One is the “inflation tax” imposed by the Federal Reserve in order to monetize the debt incurred by the US government for endless wars. President Trump has turned his back on his antiwar supporters by bombing Iran and by increasing military spending to over a trillion dollars.

The Republican insistence on increasing military spending is the main reason Congress cannot cut taxes without increasing the debt, making cuts in domestic welfare programs, or both. If the Republicans want to be the Make America Great Again party, they need to embrace a true America First foreign policy. This means no more regime change wars or US taxpayer supported “color revolutions.” Instead, America should return to the Founders’ vision of a country that, in the words of John Quincy Adams, does not go “abroad in search of monsters to destroy” and instead is “the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all” while “the champion and vindicator only of her own.”

A return to a noninterventionist foreign policy is the only way we will be able to begin to pay down the national debt and restore a government that adheres to the constitutional limits on its powers and respects all the people’s rights all the time.

(Republished from The Ron Paul Institute by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 4 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. HT says:

    My new position on military spending is cut it to nothing. Because of the fact our military is not used to protect Americans what is the point of having it? Can you imagine what we would do if 40 million foreigners attempted to enter Israel illegally? We would deploy every military asset we have to stop it. Meanwhile we have 40 million illegals at least now in America and the military did not lift a finger to stop them from coming in.

    • Thanks: Emslander
    • Replies: @anonymous123asdbd
  2. @HT

    No need to imagine because it already happened, since Israelis are themselves illegal immigrants, just like Americans are Europe’s illegal immigrant riffraff that did a Great Displacement on a whole continent.

    Now they are being displaced since they are the wimpy children of second-rate nobles, bastards, landless peasants, criminals, and whatnot, accustomed to flee to a foreign land rather than defend their home, but who could expect otherwise? It’s understandable, honestly.

    I fully agree with Mr. Paul and HT. Cut American military budget to zero. Hopefully, that makes it easier for Chinasführer Xi Jinping to conquer America and introduce Chinese social darwinism to the white man–just kidding, I mean the American mulatto man. What’s to lose? It sounds like win-win noncooperation to me.

    If the US became a Chinese state, it would win so much, it would get tired of winning.

  3. Mark G. says:

    Twenty percent of people pay eighty percent of income taxes while the other eighty percent pay twenty percent of income taxes. Almost half pay no income tax at all. People don’t care about high levels of government spending if they don’t have to pay for it. We are close to reaching the point the majority of voters receive more in government income transfers than they pay in taxes.

    We became a prosperous country with limited government and low taxes. The first one hundred and fifty years of this country up through the Coolidge presidency had federal government spending averaging less than five percent of GDP. Even as late as 1956, the year I was born, federal government spending was only 15.7% of GDP. Now it is close to twenty four percent and rising. In 1956 in constant dollar terms we were spending 500 billion dollars a year on the military. We spend double that now.

    • Agree: HT, Achmed E. Newman
  4. anon[233] • Disclaimer says:

    I think the stable coins are supposed to fix the debt problem by buying up a bunch of debt. Along with Bitcoin becoming a type of “petro-dollar”.
    As Bessent said, the US will be the crypto hub of the world.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Ron Paul Comments via RSS