RSS
This essay’s headline might have been stolen from an undergraduate literature paper submitted by Nina Jankowicz at Bryn Mawr College back in the early 2000s. I hereby preemptively apologize to the Mary Poppins of disinformation in case I have inadvertently plagiarized her, and to everyone else for bringing her name up just when you finally thought you’d heard the last of her.
My take on the evil dead white male antisemitic white nationalist conspiracy theorist from Stratford-on-Avon is not your garden-variety wokist denigration. I very much like Shakespeare, and do not hold it against him that he is white, male, and dead—nor, for that matter, that he is an antisemitic white nationalist conspiracy theorist. (And sexist to boot. If you want to piss off a feminist, just read aloud the choicest bits from The Taming of the Shrew.)
Disclaimer: I’m not a typical conservative, much less a Western chauvinist. Au contraire, I’m a defector from “Western civilization” who agrees with Gandhi that it would be a good idea. What’s more, I’m a Moroccan resident and convert to Islam. I don’t hold it against my wife that she is female, Muslim, and less melanin-challenged than I am. And I have no use for the nutjobs who think the way to save “Western civilization” is to expel all the brown people from Europe, North America, Australia, and wherever else they coexist with pallid Euro-wraiths.
Yet I appreciate Shakespeare’s antisemitism, embrace his conspiracism, and even applaud his white nationalism. To me, these are features, not bugs. They are essential aspects of his genius. Why? Because they are deep truths.
Shakespeare’s Antisemitism
Let’s start with the antisemitism. Everybody and his meshugganah brother-in-law knows that The Merchant of Venice is antisemitic, meaning anti-Jewish. Those who argue that Shylock—the madly vindictive, quintessentially Jewish usurer who wants to carve a proverbial pound of flesh out of the unfortunate goy hero Antonio—is the real hero of the play, know deep down inside that they are full of shit.
The Shylock-apologists say “hey, the poor Jew’s human,” and point to such lines as:
If you prick us, do we not bleed? If you tickle us, do we not laugh? If you poison us, do we not die? And if you wrong us, shall we not revenge?
Yes, Shylock, you Jews do bleed when pricked, laugh when tickled, die when poisoned, and seek revenge when you imagine yourselves wronged. The problem is, you are always imagining the wrong, or fabricating it, in order to justify your grossly inordinate “revenge” which is actually sheer unmitigated aggression.
Take Palestine. (No, Shylock, I did not mean that literally!)
You Jews have been committing genocidal “revenge” against the descendants of the family of Jesus, namely the Palestinians, for more than a century. And what, pray tell, is the Palestinians’ crime? In what way did they wrong you? Quite simply, they existed. They merely went about the business of living, but did so on land that you Jews claim, based on your Bronze Age mythology, that your putative ancestors received from your tribal deity Yahweh (complete with a title deed and “exterminate the current residents” clause) more than 2500 years ago.
Since nobody in their right mind cares about Bronze Age tribal deities and their genocidal real estate contracts, my dear Shylock, you and your tribe told a story about Hitler and the Germans committing outrageous wrongs—and through some sort of black magic convinced most Western goyim cattle that German wrongs somehow eternally justify the Jews’ genocidal revenge against the Palestinians! Consider the words of one such goy dupe, Piers Morgan:
Piers Morgan: “…Obviously they (Hamas) target and murder as many Jewish people as they can get their hands on. And you say it’s because they are Israelis, not Jewish.”
Ahmed Alnaouq: “Because they are occupiers, because they occupied our country.”
Morgan: “And because they are Jewish.”
Alnaouq: “No. Because they occupied our country, and colonised our country. Because they came to our country and kicked us out in 1948 and they killed thousands of Palestinians, including my grandparents.”
Morgan: “But you know why Israel was set up after World War Two. Because Jewish people were the victims of an appalling Holocaust by Hitler and the Nazis where 6 million of them were exterminated purely for their ethnicity and for being Jewish. So the Jewish people were given the state of Israel.”
Alnaouq: “My country.”
Morgan: “I understand that argument, but it wasn’t ‘Israelis’ given that land. It was the Jewish people.”
Alnaouq: “Who are you to give the Jewish people my country?”
Who indeed, Piers? I’ll tell you who. You—the typical goy dupe, that’s who. You are apparently too stupid to understand that Germans wronging Jews justifies Jews wronging Palestinians doesn’t compute. Most children can handle that level of moral reasoning by age three or four. But not you, apparently. And not the rest of your genocide-inciting media, genocide-funding taxpayers, and genocide-perpetrating arms industry.
What, precisely, has reduced Piers Morgan’s (and the West’s) moral-intellectual capacity to the sub-two-year-old level? The answer is obvious, but taboo: The crazed, vicious, ultra-vindictive, genocidal, tribal-psychopathic Jewish propaganda that dominates Western media because Jewish usurers, the descendants of Shylock, have bought it up and turned it into a Jewish-supremacist genocide-propaganda machine.
Jewish ideology justifies unlimited Jewish aggression, i.e. endless plundering of the goyim, as purported revenge for wrongs suffered. Whether it’s Shylock seeking murderous revenge for Antonio falling behind on loan payments, or Israel claiming its genocide of Gaza is retribution for October 7, Jews pretend that their lust for bloody humiliation and liquidation of their perceived enemies is natural—when in fact, as Portia shows in The Merchant of Venice, such tribally-inculcated viciousness is profoundly unnatural and inhuman.
The Jewish tribe’s penchant for grotesque and disproportionate vindictiveness, justified by lies or exaggerations about alleged wrongs suffered, is deeply rooted in the religious tradition that gave rise to Jewish tribal identity. An old Jewish joke has it that every Jewish holiday is exactly the same: “They tried to kill us, we won, let’s eat.” The Jews celebrate the massacre of their purported Egyptian enemies every Passover. They rejoice over the genocidal slaughter of 75,000 Persian men, women, and children every Purim. They make merry over the mass slaughter of Greeks and Hellenistic Jews by maniacal Maccabbees every Hanukkah.
Maybe that joke’s tag-line should be re-written as:
They tried to genocide us. We genocided them first. Let’s eat.
Or more accurately:
We made up a lie about how they, or somebody, tried to genocide us. Then we genocided them and stole their stuff, which was the whole point all along. So let’s squat on their stolen land, piss on their graves, eat from their larders, and prance around in the their murdered women’s undergarments.
Christians have traditionally viewed the Jews’ legendary penchant for bloody vindictiveness as a natural attribute of a people who base their identity on having rejected and killed Jesus. Indeed, Jewish sages have spent more than two millennia avenging themselves on that turncoat Jew Yeshua, envisioning him boiling in excrement for all eternity alongside his %$@ of a mother. Perhaps more to the point, they also spent those two millennia lying and dissembling, because they lived as a vulnerable minority among Christians and Muslims, both of which groups revere Jesus and would react badly if they knew what Jews really believed and said to each other when the goyim weren’t listening.
Getting back to The Merchant of Venice, Shylock’s lust for Christian blood echoes the Jewish boast of having spilled the blood of Christ: “We killed the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, the messenger of God.” Sara Silverman’s update became an instant classic:
Today’s Jews’ figurative bloodthirstiness, on literal display in Gaza, has also been taken literally in traditions recounted in Israel Toaff’s Passovers of Blood, which marshals historical evidence indicating that medieval Jews really did ritually murder Christian children and drain their blood, a prized and highly profitable commodity:
…Professor Toaff shows that there were a rash of these deaths over the course of two hundred years that almost always involved Ashkenazi Jews and almost always occurred during the spring (corresponding with Holy Week and Passover). The assorted records from these other ritual murder trials range from none to scant—but there is a theme that runs throughout: Jews were interested in Christian children and their blood, and there appears to be something of a network of Jews whose business was to procure such children (often, most easily, from beggars or orphans). There is also a suggestion that the Ashkenazi community closed ranks when someone or some group was accused of such a charge—and either bribed, attempted to bribe, or purchased the freedom of whomever they could.
That description of the Jewish community closing ranks and using financial power to unjustly free their guilty co-religionists could also be applied, with minor modifications, to the birth of the ADL, which emerged from Jewish oligarchs’ efforts to free their child-murdering child-raping co-ethnic, Leo Frank. In all such cases, and thousands if not millions more, wrongs done by Jews have been magically and mendaciously reimagined as wrongs done to Jews, thereby legitimizing unlimited future Jewish criminality as legitimate vengeance.
Shakespeare disposes of proverbial Jewish blood-lust by having his bloodthirsty ultra-vindictive Jew, Shylock, denied the Christian blood he so passionately yearns for, on the basis of a legal technicality: Shylock’s “pound of flesh” contract didn’t mention blood:
This bond doth give thee here no jot of blood;
The words expressly are ‘a pound of flesh:’
Take then thy bond, take thou thy pound of flesh;
But, in the cutting it, if thou dost shed
One drop of Christian blood, thy lands and goods
Are, by the laws of Venice, confiscate
Unto the state of Venice.
Portia’s judgment, read figuratively, amounts to a ban on Jews’ continuing their bloodthirsty tribal-psychopathic ways—and requiring conversion to Christianity, the hideous fate that awaits poor oppressed Shylock. But is Shakespeare’s solution realistic? At a conference last year Dr. E. Michael Jones argued that mass conversion of the Jews to Christianity (presumably forced) is the real and desirable “final solution to the Jewish problem.” I raised my hand and interjected: “You’re saying that where zyklon B didn’t work, holy water would?” The ghost of William Shakespeare, from his seat in the shadows of the last row, chuckled almost audibly.
Shakespeare as White Nationalist
So Shakespeare’s antisemitism is a feature, not a bug. It’s not something to be explained away by perverse readings casting Shylock as the real hero, and his Christian tormentors as a gaggle of grubby antisemites. Nor does it require apologies: “It’s a great play, but…” That should be corrected to: “It’s a great play, because.” Shakespeare expresses what is today tendentiously termed antisemitism because that term is designed to conceal truth, while Shakespeare’s purpose was to reveal it.
And what about his white nationalism? Here I am exposing myself to charges of another terrible -ism: anachronism. There was obviously no such thing as white nationalism in Shakespeare’s day. Indeed, there weren’t even any “white people.” Those who today might be considered white were then known as all sorts of things, and most identitarian labeling involved language, geography, and religion, not skin pigmentation. So in what sense can Shakespeare be termed a white nationalist?
To answer that question, we need to consider the deep structure of white nationalist ideology, according to which there is a white race that, because it is in danger of extinction, must rise up and overthrow its oppressors (namely the Jews and the brown people those Jews are “replacing” whites with). In other words, the WN movement grows out of fears of “replacement” and ultimately “extinction.”
Are those fears justified? According to demographers, whites were about ten percent of global population at the time of Jesus (who was not white, by the way, but Palestinian) and still just a little over 10% a thousand years later. But for various reasons, including technological innovations and global conquests, lightskinned folks of Euro-origin reached 20% of global population by 1800 and peaked at 35% by around 1900. That huge white demographic bulge imploded during the second half of the 20th century and is collapsing even faster now, with white Earthlings currently only representing around 15% and projected to dip below 10% around 2100.
Along with demographic collapse, the white nationalists fear a corresponding cultural collapse. White peoples’ traditional cultures are in disarray. Religion has been in retreat for at least a century and a half. High culture has lost ground to vapid pop culture. People’s manners and morals, their lifeways and folkways, seem empty and undignified compared to those of their ancestors.
Accompanying this demographic-cultural collapse, according to the WNs, is the rise of anti-white ideology. Nonwhites used to be underrepresented in mass media. Now it is the whites who are underrepresented. Every other commercial seems to be hyping mixed marriage. And discrimination against whites is OK—it’s called “affirmative action”—whereas every other kind of discrimination is taboo. Wokeism, in particular, features a veritable symbolic war on whites and their ostensible privileges, while the current American administration, with its anti-woke stance (and anti-immigrant hysteria) has garnered a degree of support from the pro-white movement…and plenty of blowback that could erupt with a vengeance once Trump and Trumpism have passed from the scene.
The extinction anxiety underlying white nationalism has a strong sexual-reproductive tinge. The movement’s online fora feature plenty of incels and others having issues with the fair sex in general and feminism in particular. Young white men are frustrated with the sexual market that has replaced religiously-sanctioned reproductive marriage. The smarter ones note that post-religious sexual mores, under which sex outside of reproductive marriage is no longer widely viewed as evil/shameful/illegal, are the real reason for white demographic collapse. The problem isn’t immigrants, it’s that whites are no longer having enough children to replace themselves, because they have become addicted to ease and short-term pleasure at the expense of long-term reproductive joys and sufferings. The result is plenty of angry young incels, feminists, and others who will grow old and likely end their lives as lonely old men or JD Vance’s “childless cat ladies.” And the angrier everybody gets, the faster white birthrates plunge.
And this is where Shakespeare the white nationalist comes in. Listen to him; open up his slim volume of sonnets, and right there, at the beginning, you’ll find his eloquent call to relinquish the ease and pleasure of carefree bachelorhood, and embrace the joys and travails of marriage and reproduction. Shakespeare’s sonnets 1 through 17, the so-called procreation sonnets, are addressed to a young man or “fair youth” (fair meaning both “fair-skinned” and “beautiful”) and, as Wikipedia notes, “urge this youth to not waste his beauty by failing to marry or reproduce.” White nationalists, some of whom are convinced that white people are the most beautiful people in the world, might resonate with the opening couplet of Shakespeare’s Sonnet 1:
From fairest creatures we desire increase,
That thereby beauty’s rose might never die…
If they want to solve the actual problem that is bothering them, white nationalists will need to re-establish reproductive marriage as a cherished norm, which implies relegating extramarital sex to its pre-birth-control status as despised and marginalized deviance. Good luck with that! I suppose it could happen, if enough well-connected influencers amplify Shakespeare’s eloquence in the first 17 sonnets and issue an unrelenting stream of powerful calls to drop all this trivial bullshit you’re so obsessed with and just reproduce, dammit! But frankly, that’s a long shot. You white folks would be a whole lot better off just converting to Islam, marrying four wives, and peopling the Earth with the kind of folks who could revive Andalusian-level civilization and, God willing, build the next Alhambra.
Shakespeare as Conspiracy Theorist
“Okay,” you say, “so Shakespeare was an antisemite, as we already knew, and you’ve shown he’s at least adjacent to the white nationalist movement. But surely he can’t have been a conspiracy theorist as well?”
Actually—and I know this is going to come as a shock—Shakespeare is the ultimate conspiracy theorist. Consider, if you will, his classic history play Julius Caesar. Was Shakespeare’s Caesar killed by a lone knifeman? I don’t think so! The whole play is built around a conspiracy to kill a head of state. And as all right-thinking normies know, such things never, ever happen in real life. I’m sure we can all agree that Brutus acted alone. Indeed, Caesar’s real last words were not Et tu Brute (you too, Brutus?) but Solus egisti, Brute (you acted alone, Brutus!) Additionally, there is absolutely no record of Brutus ever uttering the classic line “Modo patsy sum” (I am a patsy). What’s more, doubts about whether Brutus’s Mannlicher Carcano butterknife could have inflicted the hundreds of deep gashes and lacerations that riddled Caesar’s corpse are completely unfounded. Unfortunately, Shakespeare’s conspiratorial misinformation has somehow evaded the firewalls, shadowbanning, and deplatforming, and produced a pro-Iran, pro-Russia, pro-Hamas conspiratorial Caesar narrative that is widely believed by people who don’t get their information from professional fact-checkers.
Clearly Shakespeare wrote Julius Caesar as a paranoid, conspiratorial rant designed to fuel doubts about the Kennedy assassinations and perhaps also the killings of Lincoln, Garfield, and McKinley. The fact that he wrote it centuries before those killings does not absolve him.
Aye, marry! Twas a mere jape, forsooth. Prithee, take no offense. But many a true word is said in jest, and jesters do oft prove prophets. To wit: The worlds of Shakespeare’s plays are profoundly conspiratorial. Julius Caesar is a mere Exhibit A.
Hey ChatGPT, can you name some of the conspiracies in Shakespeare’s plays, starting with the conspiracy to kill Caesar?
- Julius Caesar –
Conspiracy to assassinate Caesar: Led by Brutus, Cassius, and other senators who fear Caesar’s growing power and ambition. It’s the quintessential political conspiracy in Shakespeare’s canon.- Macbeth –
Macbeth’s conspiracy to murder King Duncan: Spurred by prophecy and his wife’s ambition, Macbeth plots to kill Duncan and usurp the throne.
Later conspiracies include the murder of Banquo and Macduff’s family to secure his power.- Hamlet –
Claudius’s conspiracy to kill King Hamlet: He poisons his brother to take the throne and marry Queen Gertrude.
Further conspiracies include Claudius’s plan with Laertes to kill Hamlet during a rigged duel.- Othello –
Iago’s elaborate conspiracy: Iago manipulates everyone around him to destroy Othello, driven by jealousy and revenge. It’s a personal and psychological conspiracy of devastating effect.- King Lear –
Goneril and Regan’s conspiracy against Lear: The two daughters conspire to strip their father of power once he divides his kingdom.
Edmund’s conspiracy: The illegitimate son conspires against his brother Edgar and father Gloucester to gain inheritance.- Richard III –
Richard’s multiple conspiracies: He orchestrates the deaths of his brothers, nephews, and others to seize the English throne. Perhaps Shakespeare’s most villainous schemer.- Henry IV (Parts 1 & 2) –
Rebellion conspiracies: The Percy family and other nobles conspire against King Henry IV.
In Part 2, further plots involve manipulation of alliances and betrayals.- The Tempest –
Antonio and Alonso’s conspiracy against Prospero (before the play begins): Antonio usurps his brother’s dukedom.
Later, Stephano, Trinculo, and Caliban conspire comically to overthrow Prospero.- Much Ado About Nothing –
Don John’s conspiracy: He schemes to ruin Hero’s wedding by making her appear unfaithful.- Titus Andronicus –
Tamora, Aaron, and her sons: They conspire to destroy Titus and his family in a cycle of revenge.
—
Enough jesting, time to cut to the chase. This whole essay thus far has been little more than a lead-up to what I am about to say about King Lear.
King Lear is Shakespeare’s magnum opus, the play in which he most seriously goes about kicking emotional ass. The other tragedies may be tragic, evoking plenty of vicarious cathartic suffering over the sad fates of doomed lovers or unwise kings and princes, but Lear is beyond tragic: It is genuinely pissed off, raising its moral outrage to the infinite power.
The plot is fairy-tale silly: An aging, doting dotard divides his kingdom in preparation for retirement, but doltishly demands that his three daughters compete in expressing their love, with the best third of the kingdom as prize. Lear secretly hopes that his favorite daughter, Cordelia, will win. Unfortunately, she’s honest and won’t play the game, while the two evil bitches, Regan and Goneril, outdo each other in exaggerated empty flattery. His ego pricked, Lear banishes Cordelia, cuts the kingdom in two instead of three, and hands it to the bitches, who proceed to torment and finally dispossess their father, driving him out of his house and, what’s worse, out of his mind, rendering the once glorious monarch just another crazy homeless person…though an unusually eloquent one, with an equally eloquent “fool” or jester. The heart of the play is Lear’s outraged and outrageous suffering: his torment at the untender hands of his daughters, then his heartbroken mindbroken curses as he wanders soaked and tattered through wind and storm and ever-worsening political situation.
So what does this have to do with conspiracy theories? Pretty much everything. The blue-pill normie world, the world of Gonerils and Regans, is basically one big contest to see who can best say what the rulers want to hear. The winners of that contest—those who flatter the rulers most convincingly—become the rulers’ advisers, and sometimes even join the ruling circle. Such flatterers tend to be evil, blackhearted scum, like Goneril and Regan.
Those who directly oppose this world of lies undergo a “King Lear experience”: They realize with supreme horror that the comfortable platitudes they and their compatriots inhabit are infamous lies, that they have given their world over to the vilest and most despicable criminals, and that the only true word that can be spoken is a scream of pain, or, alternately, a scream of pain barely allayed by a glittering veneer of jest. In such a world, only madmen, like Lear and his Fool, are truly sane.
If you still haven’t figured out what this has to do with conspiracy theories, let me clarify what I mean by that term. The conspiracy theories I’m interested in are those that give voice to taboo truths.
“I’m not interested in conspiracy theories, except the ones that are true.” – Michael Moore
The two prototypical conspiracy theories of my time and place, the post-World War II USA, concern the Kennedy assassinations and 9/11. In both cases, supreme moral outrages were committed in broad daylight—murderous coups carried out and covered up by lying, treasonous scum who barely bothered to hide what they were doing. Both crimes divided the American public, and to some extent the world, into two kinds of people: Those who refused to accept the lies and pushed back, and those who didn’t.
The first category mainly consists of people who so suffered from the horror of these crimes—and, worse, their countrymen’s silent complicity—that they vented their anguish through rants and screeds and, in a few cases, organized campaigns of activism. These Americans after JFK, and again after 9/11, found themselves dispossessed of their democracy and living under a dictatorship of murderous Regans and Gonerils. If they spoke up and demanded their natural rights, and indeed the universe’s natural right to a bare minimum of truth, morality, and justice, they often as not found themselves ejected from that evil house, wandering homeless, looking and sounding crazy. For seeing and saying too much, they had their hearts lacerated and their eyes plucked out.
‘Tis the time’s plague, when madmen lead the blind.’ (4,1)
Those complicit in the lies invent excuses. They raise doubts, parrot platitudes. Like Chomsky, they ask: Even if you’re right, why are you so upset about the Kennedys and 9/11, when the Empire has slaughtered millions? Global warming is going to kill us all anyway, right?
A parallel exists with Lear. A reader with no heart, just leaden reason—say an AI algorithm—might ask: Why is Lear so upset about Regan and Goneril imposing DOGE-style budget cuts on his courtly retinue, and why should we share Lear’s indignation? And more broadly, isn’t there a disconnect between the extreme emotions evoked in the text, and the silly fairy-tale story that evokes them?
Lear ravishes our souls because it so perfectly depicts its villains’ outrages on human decency, and the limitless, almost infinite anguish that arises in a healthy heart exposed to such offenses. The literal or quantitative magnitude of the crimes depicted in Lear, like the actual murders of 11/22/63, 6/6/68, and 9/11/01, is beside the point. At issue is our shared sense of justice, of implied contracts, of expectations. A father does not expect his daughters to puncture his dignity, wickedly compete in humiliating him, and finally turn him out of the house in the midst of a storm. A citizen does not expect his government to treasonously collude in the sacrificial murder of his beloved leader and/or thousands of his fellow citizens, and then to lie outrageously and transparently about such deeds. These bizarrely brazen and unnatural crimes are so shocking in their callousness that they raise questions of whether actual human beings, as we know them, can possibly be behind them. They shock us in such a profound way that we are left with only two choices: Pretend we didn’t see them (“pluck out our eyes”) and live on as numbed half-human semi-zombies; or rage against them as Lear does.
So Lear is the ultimate conspiracy theorist because the conspiracies, at least the ones that matter, are real and unspeakably evil, and anyone who acknowledges this noble truth inevitably reacts, at some level, as Lear does. Those who walk the path of truth risk dying heartbroken, like Lear. But unlike their tormentors—meaning not just the criminals, but also those fellow citizens who have blinded themselves to reality, or worse, held their tongues—these tragic heroes still at least have hearts to break. They partake of the real and the good, and hence have ontological heft, ergo souls, that move on to better things.
King Lear ends with a call to truth that acknowledges its emotional and moral underpinnings, as well as its cost, and offers good advice that in our “sad time” only the “conspiracy theorists” have taken:
The weight of this sad time we must obey,
Speak what we feel, not what we ought to say.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
For I have sworn thee fair, and thought thee bright,
Who art as black as hell, as dark as night.
shakespeare didn’t write shakespeare, eddie de vere did…
geez…
Who says there’s no hell? Sarah Silverman’s hell is classic Freudian self-hatred that can only be ameliorated, as she thinks, by making others hate her. She’s not so offensive as she’s a pathetic, self-loathing loser.
There is no such thing as “Anti-Semitism”, it is just a trope like calling someone an “asshole”.
The Jews born in North America, Europe, or anywhere else that is not the Levant disqualifies the SEMITE moniker for them.
Benny Yahoo is a good example of a non-Semitic Jew – he was born in Poland, not the Levant.
Not good enough for TUR.
Provide something to qualify your statement.
Zyklon B was used to kill lice, not humans.
Shakespeare was almost certainly a Jew himself. He had knowledge of the talmud (and quoted it in his own works), which no Anglo would have had at the time, and he was intimately familiar with Jewish ghetto culture. Jews have always been heavily involved in the entertainment industry.
Shakespeare was Black, yo
It’s a bad idea to lecture people about getting laid if you’re a white man with a non-white wife. There was a guy I used to know years ago, in his case there was a perverse fetish for Third World women which coincided with his political and religious choices.
But in other cases, that we see in the general dissident realm, it’s what they could get, white women weren’t available to them as mates and so they go with what’s available, and afterwards tell themselves it’s actually really cool to have an Asian wife.
In any case, why not use it to climb the social status ladder of liberal discourse ? Like Vance, you might even get your amazing transformation reviewed in the NYT.
Think about what he’s saying. Barrett you are white folk, albeit a broken kind, who’s white opened mindedness went so far as to dirty his own genes and betray his race. You’re a white liberal who’s adopted a brown religion. You wanted to go the extra mile. A religion that served as a force for brown groups to seek to dominate other groups, certainly including whites, at a certain point in history. Instead of being conquered, you’ve willing signed up as another New Age white convert to _fill in the blank_.
It’s also interesting to me, he thinks you need Islam to do x, which makes me think Islam gives him permission he doesn’t feel he has as a white. Permission, basedness has to come from some brown hand.
It’s like that meme of the kid with his head about to explode who hasn’t told anyone for 20 seconds he’s libertarian. So it is with Barrett and Islam. (How many brown Muslims keep telling you they’re a Muslim ? none)
There’s still time to turn this around and make your peace with your genes and identity.
And you missed the secret COdE to unlock in Shakespeare, a prophecy about HoloGramZ on 9/11 and the fAke ViRuS cOviD and GrAy Aliens and Trump would fake his own shooting and the secret QDrop would be posted on Veteran’s Today. Look DeeeEper.
But Shakespeare was actually a brown person anyway.
This is outrageous! Shylock had relatives—including his grandparents on both sides— who died in the Holocaust!
There you have it! No mention of you on the Yad Vashem Wall of Honor, Bard!
Dats rite. Shakespeare and Kang George were NOT White, yo. Dats rite.
A lot of White guys try to make YOU think it is cool to date non whites because they CANNOT date a White female. If the writer married a Muslim woman IF I am not mistaken he HAD to convert to Islam whereas a Muslim man can marry a non Muslim woman. See it is hip now to care about kikes killing brown Palestinians ( now Jesus was a Palestinian?) but you CANNOT be cool to care about White South Africans being killed by Blacks or Muslim Pakis raping White girls in the land of Shakespeare. Peep this, most of these so called Jews are mutts but to say that Jesus was a Palestinian is hilarious. 😂 Are not Palestinians mutts as well? Jesus is Palestinian? ROTFLMMFWAO Well, geographically speaking….😂😂😂😂😂😂. You have to make sure you are not canceled from the next hipster cocktail party, dude.
Thomas North
You haven’t done your homework, “art”.
Quite a little farrago of nonsense.
I am one of those mad conspiracy theorists, scorned by conformist academics, who are convinced that “Shakespeare’s” plays and poetry were not written by a historically obscure man from Stratford. Who was the real “Shakespeare”? I don’t know, but Edward de Vere seems most likely.
A Jewish black gay transsexual undocumented hispanic. Every page of his works has coded revelations, evident if read from bottom to top and right to left, that prove it.
Dats rite !
Right. White women are now too high up the food chain, so they aim lower. And they will go the whole way because of this, having children, adopting an identity, and then say ‘whiteness doesn’t matter.’ ‘Those stupid racists out there don’t get it.’ My experience of seeing this in real life, including among some educated whites, is dismal actually. It can be bizarre. Something has collapsed. The result is they take themselves out of their own gene pool effectively.
There may be different things too, probably a mix of negative feelings about how they fit in to their own group. These people become a kind of cultural-trans, to the point, they actually don’t realize they are white anymore apparently, an inconvenience they have simply transcended in their piousness. The brown hand is always ‘good’ and noble. There’s no white agency, just white cultural ignorance to them.
Probably a bit of white savior complex comes in too, like Avatar
Shakespeare was a a crypto Jewish immigrant woman named Emilia Bassano. Crypto Jews have always hated Jews like Josephus Flavius, the famous Jew who was adopted by Roman Emperor Vespasian Flavius for helping Rome defeat the Jewish rebellions and who helped stop the Jews from overthrowing the Romans empire by co-writing Titus Flavius’s ultimate insult against the Jews, the Gospels.
It was still illegal to be Jewish during Shakespeare’s time, as the death of Christopher Marlowe proves -because Marlowe was going to expose how the Roman emperor Titus Flavius invented Christianity. So, in order to not get caught exacting her literary revenge against the Flavian’s, sick inside joke against Jews planted in the New Testament, Emilia Bassano had to be very careful indeed, and chose the “nom” ‘Will I am Shakes Speare’ in order to not to get caught or she would end up getting Christopher Marlowed herself.
https://www.opednews.com/populum/page.php?f=Shakespeare-was-Authored-b-Shakespeare-250416-993.html
The elites have been fooling us all with this Christianity v. Judaism anti-human shit-show for centuries. They’re both lies, as John Lash’s ‘Not in His Image’ book, and Joseph Atwill’s ‘Caesar’s Messiah’ book, proves.
How? By refusing to be pussies-wimps-simps and demanding equality.
A key way to attain the latter is by changing laws.
And that requires men to unite and fight for them.
For example, divorced dads should get the kids until such time as guys catch up historically with women custody-wise. Wives-mothers who break marital contracts should get the bills.
Similarly, until women fill military cemeteries equally, bints alone should fight wars. Since women are weaker, more would have to be drafted, serve, and die. Those unfit for frontline combat could hold hands and walk across fields to clear mines. (<:)
Impossible? Only if men continue to be doormats.
The amazing thing is that guys who think the above scenarios are impossible, outrageous, or immoral are perfectly willing to be reamed by misandric feminist laws.
White males need to ignore outdated social contracts. Fathers should teach sons how to stand up for themselves. Again, the key is for White Western men to unite and fight and stop acting like laws make themselves. Independence isn't always a strength. No individual soldier, much less a militia, ever beats an army. Yet guys in 2025 still have no group comparable to NOW…which has reamed men for 60 years. They continue to think each man must fight his own battles.
Insane.
Make new dating rules! Like “The one who accepts a date pays for it.”
Or insist that if girls want first-dates paid for, they must give first-bjs.
Letting sluts only pay when they ‘feel like it” (and then only after multiple dates!) means if the guy and girl both date 10 other people, he’ll be out-of-pocket for 20 meals while she gets to keep all her money.
Guys could make prostitution cheap and legal. See how fugly, booger-ringed, tatted-ho feminists react.
If young men subsidize OnlyWhores, tax the latter’s earnings at 90% to pay for men’s rights programs.
Men should also pass laws so college guys can anonymously accuse any female on campus of being a whore, resulting in her hair being shaved and “Skank!” tattooed on her forehead. When males can ruin female lives equally (and with impunity!) with lies, things will change pronto.
Again: Nothing prevents laws from passing that protect men’s rights except male passivity and guys’ refusal to unite and fight.
I left the “who was Shakespeare” conspiracy theory out of this article because I was already going out on enough limbs, and also because I don’t have anything to add to Ron Unz’s essay.
It might sound ridiculous, but I am convinced that Shakespeare was not English. The mystery about his personal life is frankly extremely suspicious, and during his time Catholics were ferociously persecuted in England. So it frankly probable that he was a stranger or a son of strangers, probably Italians, and therefore compelled to live behind the scenes. We all know English are masters at hiding the inconvenient.
Great article. Thanks.
Whoever has written Shakespearean stories was sick in his heart. So much hate , revenge, blood , something was troubling this man. Kevin ,please write nice story , just like good Moslem would do to bring peace and tranquility to these troubled hearts . There is so much mayhem everywhere that only love of Christ will steady human heart .
Does it matter?
King James was tutored by George Buchanan who held seder meals and studied among the Jews. The notion that paraphrases of the Talmud would never be picked by someone with the associations of Shakespeare at the time of great religious controversy and therefore it must have been a Jew who wrote the plays holds no water.
The evidence is overwhelming (despite the bleats of many British who don’t want it to be widely accepted and known as that would ruin Shakespeare among those viciously bigoted people) that William Shakespeare was raised in a recusant Catholic household. That he would have often been among Jesuit priests who should have had the widest education possible at the time. Not to mention the the fact that education in olden times was taken seriously, as opposed to today, when most education, tailored for the masses, is as serious as taking a man of the Congo and installing him as an Oxford Don.
Sometimes the truth is fairly simple.
No matter how the critics try to coax out interpretations of Shakespeare that gratify their modern sensibilities, in the same way they attempt to spoil and contaminate (as can be done by staging and in cinema) every true piece of art, it can’t change that Shakespeare was the sort of man that he was.
Shakespeare is the sort of man who would have fallen into obscurity, certainly in the English speaking world, if it had been widely known that he was the sort of man that Thomas Carlyle said he was (to paraphrase Carlyle): “the noblest product of the Catholicism of the Middle Ages” Could his plays even make any sense at all if he was not imbued with that heritage? How could they have been produced by someone who was NOT?
And of course Shakespeare’s conception of the Jews was a fairly moderate medieval Catholic view. When “antisemitism” is the truth.
Who can pretend that the “pound of flesh” is a lie in the face of Gaza?
Yeah, but you’re forgetting how his great grandparents were Hoax Survivors ™ . Walking backwards when queued, so they didn’t have to be gassed. Although rumor has it his great grandfather lined up twice for the Masturbation Machine of Death.
And what a financial hit the Shyster took!
My daughter! O my ducats! O my daughter,
O my Christian ducats!
Justice, the law, my ducats, and my daughter!
I only hope he was able to get his monetary due…, just reparations for eternal suffering.
The kike and crypto kikesucker’s goal is to make all talented Whites from the past crypto Jews, nigras ( yes, they actually think they can pass this off) or some other assorted Mud. These anti Whites can’t handle the FACT that Whites have done more for the World than all the other races and mixed breeds in the World combined. And yes, on average White women and men are GENERALLY more attractive than the rest of the world. Troof hurts no matter how many gin and tonics you fry your brain at elite fart sniffing cocktail parties.
“they tried to kill us, we survived, let’s eat”
Your version is better. The one I heard above elides the reality of 2 sided conflict.
No seriously I’ve heard that one. In his defense, the person who told me this wasn’t much for going to temple. I now suspect he found the traditions disturbing, and the flippant trivilaization of his “festivals” is a way of saying: Dont ask me about the details – it’s HORRIBLE.
Or as Andre the Giant, complains in the Princess Bride:
“My Way isn’t Very Sporting…” At some point one has to cope or come to terms with reality – to repent, or as they say in greek, metanoia – to change one’s mind.
Its really bizarre and cringe. How can you not see that King Lear was a bumbling idiot to give a third of his kingdom to Eve?
This is an expression of your fundamental naivety, not your essential and external grievance.
Keep trying. An essay like this would have really upset the tenured blonde bimbo I knew.
Understandable. It’s a subject that needs to be treated at great length. I probably shouldn’t have gone off topic but I like to set the cat among the pigeons by mentioning the anti-Stratfordian heresy.
Zyklon B gets a bad rap. Who knew that killing lice could take so long!
I read Sobrans book after earlier reading his article on the same topic. It made more sense than having a man who purportedly being a “man of letters” speaks so very little near the end of his life. Saying that was “odd” doesn’t do it justice.
Shakespeare was a wise Latino woman.
Well Jesus was Palestinian so that is highly possible.
This is a big stretch of presenting Shakespeare as a white nationalist, conspiracy theorist. When he lived Europe was white, no need for white nationalism, he was just a voice of his world.
Conspiracy theorist because he exposed the corruption of his time like many other authors.
As for antisemitism, the term is a modern and absurd one. Europe and most of the world has always been anti Jews. Countless famous authors have been telling the truth about them over the ages.
It is only very recently that extreme censorship was created to silence critics of the many sins and evil deeds of the Jews (following the holohaox for instance). And it is not by chance, but because they own our politicians, media and governments.
I agree with Kevin when he writes that one of the problem is that white people have stopped to make children but I disagree that it is entirely their fault.
“The problem isn’t immigrants, it’s that whites are no longer having enough children to replace themselves, because they have become addicted to ease and short-term pleasure at the expense of long-term reproductive joys and sufferings. The result is plenty of angry young incels, feminists, and others who will grow old and likely end their lives as lonely old men or JD Vance’s “childless cat ladies.” And the angrier everybody gets, the faster white birthrates plunge.”
First whites have been under the heaviest propaganda and brainwashing efforts ever perpetrated against humanity, especially since 1945, to transform their traditional values and societies into the ‘cultural’ sewer it is today.
Call it cultural Marxism, wokism, or whatever term used these days, it has been brought on white people mainly (and Asiatic countries like Japan/Korea which copy cat western civilization) by guess who? Mostly the Jews of course.
Secondly, even if white weren’t making enough children, it wouldn’t be a problem if the criminal politicians in power didn’t have the explicit agenda of flooding their countries with non-white immigrants.
Actually less people in Europe and the USA would be a blessing as it would mean more available jobs and housing, less pressure on nature, less traffic and less subsidies to give away to the inactive types.
Again, this great replacement agenda is not coming from the sky. We can recognize the Jewish hand in it helped by a large number of white cucks helping the genocide of their own race.
Sure, white if they want to end this genocide know what to do: children, build white communities and retake their lands.
Blaming white for being invaded by immigrants and for not making children is part of white bashing too.
Finally, I an glad that the Reconquista took place in Spain and glad that Muslims and Jews were expelled from Christendom.
It took them 600 hundred years but they did it.
We should look at our ancestors and try to emulate them as much as possible and remember their courage, faith and indestructible motivation.
It doesn’t need to be violent. Remigration, embracing ad sustaining traditional values like Russia does, making children and rebuilding our communities are pert of the reconstruction.
So Kevin is right: By cherishing and spreading traditional European and therefore white values, will we reconquer and reclaim our lands, expand and end the demographic bleeding.
This is an exceptionally well-written piece, appreciated only by those who place a premium upon wisdom.
Indeed, ‘many a true word is said in jest, and jesters do oft prove prophets,’ yet more oft, a fool’s truth is his fancy, be it bred in heart or head, spread the breadth of this very thread.
The Jewish way of thinking has been all pervasive in the west since WW2, there is a superiority in aspects of this thought process but there is also a down side.
The problem is that many Christians have embraced that thought process without discernment, its hard not to when you are brought up surrounded by it, but Christians haven’t realised that you can think like that but at the same time reject the morality of the worst of that thought process thereby retaining your humanity…your soul.
An example of Jewish thought would have you continue to buy up real-estate and create a monopoly over it, that way you can extract rent ad infinitum, the consequences of these actions is you have the following generations demoralized with a sense of hopelessness due to the worry of meeting rents and an executive always wasting so much time and effort trying to solve homelessness.
A Christian could do the same if immortal, a true Christian wouldn’t even think of it taking just what they can use and leaving the rest for others.
What society do you want, one that is sustainable or one that grows fast but also dies quickly?
I think Shakespeare would have enjoyed this article. Well done!
The Japanese movie adaptation of Macbeth is a great story even without Shakespeare’s poetic language. The psychology of the characters is great and the plot is great. It’s English title is Throne of Blood. Directed by Kurosawa.
And Beethoven, Bach, Mozart, Leonardo, Michelangelo, Keats, Goethe, Dostoevsky etc, ad infinitum, were all Jews, too. Indeed, ALL Jews are geniuses, and ALL geniuses, Jews.
I was unaware that so many of Shakespeare’s plays feature conspiracy tales. In my opinion, this is further evidence not of Shakespeare’s presumed anti semitism, but that he was himself a Jew!
Who else but a Jew could have cooked up the entanglements and dark conspiratorial twists of these plays?
Nice work, Kevin!
Great stuff Professor. Loved every word.
Regarding JFK, the jig is up.
Take a look at the document highlighted below and ask yourself, why in the appendix is Shin Beth annotated?
Since the justification for the coup d’tat was treason from an Angelton mole in the Kremlin, ask yourself what’s the odds the mole was a fake Semite and connected to Ben Gurion?
https://ia800501.us.archive.org/26/items/operation-zipper/OperationZipper_text.pdf
It is indeed an intriguing theory. Quoting from an Italian website:
I usually prefer the term vermin, but lice works too. Parasites anyhow.
What a strange or more frankly, idiotic way to introduce himself:
I am a conservative, but not a typical one. I think western civilisation is terrible and should die. My wife is a brown Moroccan. Those who care about the White race are nutjobs.
Seems like Kevin drowned any semblence of conservatism with his powerful, yet exuberant antisemitism. He took the wrong lessons from a strong moral stance regarding isreal which today is automatically attached to ostracism.
I guess some people will break when forced outside the mainstream.
There is nothing wrong with the White race. It is good and decent to love one’s own.
(As an aside, Moroccans in Europe have nothing to be proud of. They are among the most violent and disfunctional migrants)
Excellent. One of the best essays on this site. I must read it again.
Well, given that nazis allegedly didn’t consider Jews as human…
“An example..real-estate..monopoly..extract rent ad infinitum,..”.
Missing: USS Liberty attack.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwi3-rHOoeuNAxX8M1kFHbdeKSIQFnoECBoQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jewishvirtuallibrary.org%2Fquot-the-uss-liberty-case-closed-quot&usg=AOvVaw3yd6qou72rAWgkNlAxnBya&opi=89978449
a good primer
http://biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/2014/09/02/was-shylock-a-jew/
Charles will is man’s son !!!!! LA Times…a few decades ago….
Shakespeare is renowned for using obscene language to the extent that his posthumous editors felt the necessity to ”bowdlerize” him.
KB bowdlerized his description: ”defector” instead of ”defecator”.
You are knocking at wrong door. How do you know we are living in this world without discernment.
The Gospel of Christ Jesus is enough to know the truth if one follows it.
Regarding amassing wealth you should look at Vanguard, Black-rock, and all real estate speculators rather than pretty average ownership of properties by Christians. We know we should not take with us anything from this world up to heaven.
I know that there are many religious people who don’t know The Gospel , and follow just tradition of their fathers and culture.
Fine playwright – great drama
Nazi. Nazi-Fascist! – Capitalist! Imperialsit! – Holocuast-Denier…
To Automaton Ethicon.
You know, Jews were pretty awful long before Jesus came long. The word Hebrew descends from ‘Apiru or Hapiru, which means “outlaw” in the ancient Assyro-Babylonian and Egyptian languages. The term refers to individuals and to peoples who choose to be outside the accepted structure of political alliances and loyalties of the societies in which they dwell.
Speaking of “conspiracy theories” anyone can see why Jews would hate Christians, having been so badly mistreated by them after being libeled in their mythology as the unrepentant murderers of God Himself. Historically the crucifixion narrative is the story of Romans punishing a non-citizen according to their laws, but obviously early Christians would not have scored many converts in the Roman world by telling them that their people were the new god’s assassins. Much easier to write in Jews as the ultimate villains, particularly as they had become pariahs after their treacherous rebellion against Rome of 66-70 CE.
The irony is that the worst aspects of Christianity are the ideas and worldview that it continued from its unfortunate origin in Judaism, its arrogance, hypocrisy, relentless dualism and morbid judgmentalism being especially appalling.
‘You white folks would be a whole lot better off just converting to Islam, marrying four wives, and peopling the Earth with the kind of folks who could revive Andalusian-level civilization and, God willing, build the next Alhambra.’ — Kevin Barrett
Stripped of its deliberate hyperbolic edge, this assertion remains delusional.
Four wives means a culture in which alpha males win all the spoils, while bitter beta males remain unattached. So much for social stability!
And despite legitimizing the male fantasy of multiple sexual partners, all under his domain, the jealousy and catfighting among multiple wives competing for the attention of one husband is too awful to contemplate — truly the definition of domestic hell on earth.
While sharing Dr Barrett’s admiration for the Alhambra, I’m compelled to observe that this triumph of Andalusian civilization was 800 years ago. What has Islamic culture accomplished lately? Among the 38 members of the OECD rich countries club, Türkiye is the sole Islamic one, and far from the top rank.
Truth to tell, the Islamic world has been in relative decline for centuries. And it’s not obvious what would turn it around. But one has to suspect that ditching the superstitious crutch of Abrahamic religions and finding a better one would benefit all nations currently afflicted with this Hebraic-inflected intellectual poison.
Israel is our misfortune.
Do you go to the same mosque as John Brennan(CIA guy)🐷
also, Kevin didn’t mention –
It’s so shocking the way there are NO GAYS in any of the plays of Shakespeare.
Can we put up with this?
NB Kevin might like my new conspiracy-book about who Shakespeare REALLY WAS – https://www.amazon.co.uk/Bard-Gunpowder-Plot-Nicholas-Kollerstrom/dp/1739999444
I combine it with the Gunpowder-Plot conspiracy-narrative, using Webster Tarpley’s version of What Really happened (there was no gunpowder….patsies tortured to confess… British intel brewing up the plot)
As regards conspiracies in Shakespeare, I quote the lines that Webster Tarpley used to use –
‘Who is so gross / that cannot see this palpable device? / Yet who’s so bold but says he sees it not?’ (Richard III)
If you attended my university in the 70s and majored in English Literature you would have graduated without ever having studied any Shakespeare at all. The English dept was run and staffed by Jews (many without any degrees themselves), and you would have received many lectures about the magnificence and importance of Jewish writers like Isaac Babel and Saul Bellow, writers who are now justifiably forgotten.
Shakespeare wasn’t a genius. He was a degenerate queer. That’s why Anglos love him so much. He also happened to be a Jew (another thing Anglos love).
Daydreaming about the Holocaust-themed amusement park two days ago, I also thought of that. Not a queue, but a room in a fun-fair ride.
To escape, you have to walk backwards to a door. The exterior of the door has bright neon lights and roaring applause. If you don’t do it by the time the ride ends, you are a loser, so have to leave through the entry door.
In the video-game version, there is a GTA-style training level, with the prompt ‘Walk backwards to escape.’ Then, after you do it, the advice is ‘By walking backwards, you can escape from many situations.’
I am familiar with the arguments you exposed. I find curious that almost nobody in the UK reminds the historical truth, i.e. that during Shakespeare’s time and for a century later in the UK, Catholics were persecuted, imprisoned and executed. That would explain why Shakespeare had to act behind the scenes and the consequent, apparent “mystery” of his personal life.
If someone wants to write about an antisemitic play, I would suggest Jew of Malta by marlow as being ridiculously antisemitic. And in addition, much more entertaining. TS Eliot alluded to it quite often…curious. I’ve also heard that there’s antisemitic content in Nash‘s unfortunate traveler, although I have not completed that work yet. That is a short novel prose work.
Perhaps would be interesting to have a longer form essay on Elizabethanantisemitism that encompasses all the works. And perhaps some that I don’t know about. That way you could people could teach me something for a change.
Stopped reading when I read ” convert to Islam”
Surprised this wasn’t universal.
Francis Bacon. Knowledge of Hebrew and of Kabbalah I believe.
In any controversy I go to wikipedia, always a trustworthy source.
According to wiki it is plausible that a Jewish woman Emilia Lanier (née Aemilia Bassano; 1569–1645) is the actual author of at least part of the plays and poems attributed (falsely, I say) to William Shakespeare.
The proofs:
she was a contemporary;
she wrote poems;
she had musicians in her family (*see musical references in “Shakespeare’s plays”);
and she was of course, familiar with both Jewish life and the climate of anti-semitism in her time.
The fact that she makes Shylock the quintessential ruthless, avaricious money lending Jew who also had a boiling thirst for revenge for the persecution of Jews by Goyim is, in my opinion the strongest argument. Let me explain:
She came from a rich Jewish family, quite possibly the equivalent of todays’ Jewish millionaires/billionaires. She had important connections to the Court and was the first woman whose poems were published.
Her plays falsely presented under the Shakespeare’s pseudonym, especially The Merchant of Venice, were the “honey trap” cleverly built by her to fool the era’s anti-semites into revealing themselves. Every single spectator who applauded The Merchant of Venice eventually died.
The irony is that the worst aspects of Christianity are the ideas and worldview that it continued from its unfortunate origin in Judaism, its arrogance, hypocrisy, relentless dualism and morbid judgmentalism being especially appalling.
The New Covenant has nothing to do with old one except the promise of new one.
Wise man holds his views unless he knows what is talking about, you don’t know, arrogance apples to you.
The main difference is , because no one is able to fulfill the obligations of The Law , the righteousness is attained through the faith by God’s grace, just like Abraham did.
“If someone wants to write about an antisemitic play, I would suggest Jew of Malta by marlow as being ridiculously antisemitic.”
Marlowe was a vocal atheist. Literary critics and people who have actually read the play see it as generally anti-all three major religions, with the Christians and Turks being equally repugnant.
“I’ve also heard that there’s antisemitic content in Nash‘s unfortunate traveler, although I have not completed that work yet. ”
You’d better hurry up and “complete” it. Nash will be grateful
Perhaps would be interesting to have a longer form essay on Elizabethanantisemitism that encompasses all the works. And perhaps some that I don’t know about. That way you could people could teach me something for a change.
“For a change”?! No way can anyone teach you something.
Quote-“ You white folks would be a whole lot better off just converting to Islam, marrying four wives, and peopling the Earth with the kind of folks who could revive Andalusian-level civilization and, God willing, build the next Alhambra”
I would settle for marrying only one Muslim woman without having to convert to Islam. Would that be possible?
Thanks for a great article that touches the innermost soles of those who care and who can still think for themselves.
Being a crypto-jew and a papist are not mutually exclusive. Almost all crypto-jews in history have been papists.
In the Koran, Jesus and The Apostles converted to Islam and Jesus sent out His followers to enslave White Christians. He told the Muslims to rule over Spain and Greece after He departed, and to rape White Italian women and enslave White Christians on the Barbary Coast. All kidding aside:
Any White man or woman who converts to Islam or Judaism is the biggest self hating white traitor trash Cucks around. You would be better off becoming a Satanist or at least become a Buddhist. We all know why whores like Liz Taylor and Marylyn Monroe “converted” to Judaism, lol, what a joke. Okay Aisha, I will wear a rag head and denounce Christianity so I can have a non white wife and be kewel, plus I can spew out venom about my own race because White women won’t have anything to do with me.
Cue: Sweet Emotions by Aerosmith
Innermost souls; sorry for typo.
“Since nobody in their right mind cares about Bronze Age tribal deities…”
Exactly! So you should have thought about that when migrating over to the obverse side of the same coin, viz. Allah. No one other than fools and misguided souls fall for the fabrications of Mohammed. Of course, you’re too smart to be taken for a camel ride but it must have been the female jockey that got your goat going very fast. To each his own!
P. S. And you’re wrong about Shylock. Antonio knew, along with other Venetian merchants, of the lender’s practices and called him out for it in not so gentle terms but he withstood those mean men and insults. He was the victim of the dishonest Venetians, who after having agreed to a contract knowing full well what it entailed reneged on it using the same clever tricks they accused the lender off. And to add insult to the injury, they corrupted his only child for their own nefarious purposes, including suborning her to steal from her own father to satisfy the lust of a gentile, a born enemy of her tribe–Had an Arab/Muslim woman been thus soiled, what do you think the punishment would have been? Off with the head, most likely–but old and beaten Shylock takes it, albeit grumbling, without injury to anyone. Shylock was the victim!
Generally speaking, white men who hate women such as yourself dream of thick black cock up your ass.
You don’t need to ‘unite and fight’. You need to accept the fact that you’re ass-eating, cum-gobbling cocksuckers.
This is also the reason for the declining birth rate in white societies. It’s hard to impregnate women while you’re dreaming of black cock.
The reason white men are such disgraceful pussies is that you’ve allowed outsiders–Jews, Muslims, African, Pakis, etc–to completely take over your societies.
No other societies have this problem.
And the reason is that white men are pathetic, whining, sniveling, cowards.
Shakespeare is the root of “modern sensibilities.” You would be hard pressed to find any other body of work more formative of “modern sensibilities” than Shakespeare’s
To the extent that “Catholicism of the middle ages” was merely a form of paganized humanism, this is true. It is incorrect to call anything about Shakespeare “noble,” though. He was a vulgarian and proud of it (typical of Jews).
“I would settle for marrying only one Muslim woman without having to convert to Islam”
Why “settle” for one? Why not become an old-fashion Mormon and have as many wives as you please?
“the innermost soles”
Typo, I hope….
Somewhat interesting addition to history. It makes a lot of sense especially as I must have read somewhere that this obscure figure of yours, who came from nowhere, actually married Shakespeare and helped him with his writings. She squandered all his money on fancy costumes making Shakespeare to die almost penniless.
Magnificent. Kevin at his best. Funny and tragic at the same time. Obviously inspired by the good ghost of Shakespeare! Just one question, Kevin. Do you have a source for this statement. Do the North African Romans (Berbers, etc.) of 2000 years ago count as White?
I am torn: which if the two developments (#1 and #2 below) brought to my attention by the Forward (with #1 given more prominence) is more momentous or, to use the term much in vogue these days, can constitute an “inflection point”? I wonder if AI could help me here. I hope it is not anti-semitic to wonder.
—-
(1). What began as a two-minute ritual in a gated Florida community has escalated into a federal civil rights case — and the latest flashpoint over religious expression in shared spaces. I spoke with both sides to find out how tefillin became the center of a culture war in Boca Raton.
What happened: Isaac Scharf lives in Boca Grove, a community of 400+ homes with a golf course, pool, and clubhouse. He invited Jewish comedian Jake Adams — who has nearly 2 million social media followers — to film a video that included Scharf wrapping tefillin on him inside the club.
The fallout: The homeowners association suspended Scharf and his family for 90 days, barred them from club events, and deactivated their automatic gate access.
The response: Boca Grove said it acted after “feedback from multiple members — Orthodox and non-Orthodox alike — who felt the behavior depicted in a publicly circulated video mocked sacred traditions in a way they found deeply offensive.”
What’s next: The Scharfs’ suspension ended Monday. Now they’re suing for religious discrimination — and seeking $50 million in damages.
—————————
(2) Israel is gearing up for a possible imminent strike on Iran — a move that could disrupt or postpone the Trump administration’s push for a nuclear deal. (JTA)
Amid rising tensions, the U.S. is pulling nonessential embassy staff from Baghdad and relocating military families in the Gulf, with President Donald Trump warning the region “could be a dangerous place” and vowing to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. (Axios)
Another nut job writes an article.
Why do so many have, as just the most obvious example, giant and strangely shaped noses? There must be some connection among Sephardi, Mizrahi, and Ashkenazi for them usually to share that characteristic. Certain other features are also odd, yet shared.
The early history of plastic surgery was to a small degree driven by an urge to help war veterans with hideous wounds look more normal, but the main impetus was to help jews to not look like jews.
Even Fitzgerald, IIRC, makes a sly reference to the nose of a minor character having been ‘bobbed’ (among several other coded comments on jews in his works).
Around the time of Fitzgerald becoming a great writer, the overbearing mother of the infant Roy Cohn (Cohen) took him to have his nose ‘bobbed’, it reduced the size of his schnozz, but the surgeon left a very obvious scar, and Roy hated that ever after.
Didn’t stop him later becoming addicted to other plastic surgery procedures.
Absolutely excellent analogies and a brilliant essay, Kevin!
Oriental eyes
Black flat nose, thick lips
Both of you guys are kike trolls talking to each other…..
ROTFLMMFWAO
The fuck you talkin’ ’bout, retard?
Jesus was a JEW, not a Christian. He believed the world was going to end in his lifetime.
So-called ‘Christianity’ was invented mainly by Paul–another Jew–and by the writers of the Gospels decades after the fact.
Anyway, the so-called ‘new covenant’ is a complete fraud. The entire concept of a savior or ‘Messiah’ comes from the Old Testament, and Jesus, the gay Jew con-artist, bears absolutely no resemblance to the the messiah described in the OT.
He was supposed to be a powerful leader and warrior sent to vanquish the enemies of the Jews, not an effeminite pussy who ‘turns the other cheek’.
I guess it really doesn’t matter in the final analysis, because all these Abrahamic religions–actually, all religions–are man-made frauds designed to control people and give comfort to those who can’t handle the fact that death is final.
Because they are Semitic. Semites have big noses. This is not controversial.
https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/505467831_122098220744906012_3205258636258170722_n.jpg?_nc_cat=111&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=833d8c&_nc_ohc=MihnRCBtJkwQ7kNvwFL8f4D&_nc_oc=AdlXiTM_UYXeg9q40gTFKfHWDwdtAPEnuwHd2l8XhqyunVCNmMnkcuRtvcmtsOhy8wI&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-lga3-1.xx&_nc_gid=QeGKBLivbUYQKS9764BbFw&oh=00_AfNaQ3-BbbFlJJI43Uft5YmVDehq2Isri7bFsiJbgWeuMQ&oe=6850B636
Lots of good points. As to this, you are of course right:
KB: “The problem isn’t immigrants,”
Absolute malicious rubbish. The problem is EXACTLY immigrants.
In the time it takes for you to finish reading this comment, over 100 illegal and also “legal” shitstains will have snuck into this country to steal its resources, plunder what whites have created, and pollute our social capital. Even “legal” immigrants are malignant growths: whites don’t want them and never have, they are here as human WMDs in service to their Jewish masters.
a) No amount of “white baby-making” can offset this ferocious non-stop invasion, and
b) the very presence of illegal shitstains is a major cause of white infertility. Shitstains take up vast white resources, flood our white schools and hospitals with the (also-illegal) children they shit out, drive up housing costs, ruin entire neighborhoods making them unliveable for whites, deplete the supply of useable (by white standards) housing stock which whites built, destroy infrastructure which whites built *for themselves* not for shitstains, and generally make life impossible for whites in their own country. Family formation for whites becomes increasingly unaffordable and well-nigh impossible. AND ALL BECAUSE OF IMMIGRANTS.
I repeat: BECAUSE OF IMMIGRANTS.
KB if you perpetuate this malignant lie, you are merely pulling off your own mask and exposing the hate-filled anti-white creature squirming beneath.
Interesting – just recently there were some articles written questioning the authorship of Shakespeare’s plays – not that it changes KB’s theme here, but which might just have to be attributed to someone else – a word search in DaLimbraw Library on SHAKESPEARE –
https://crushlimbraw.blogspot.com/search?q=Shakespeare&updated-max=2024-03-30T12:27:00-07:00&max-results=20&by-date=false&m=1 – a list of headnotes to articles which show strong evidence of another author.
This might be more personal to KB – the connection between Islam and Judaism – to DaLimbraw Library we go ISLAM JUDAISM – https://crushlimbraw.blogspot.com/search?q=Islam+Judaism&max-results=20&by-date=false&m=1 – another list of headnotes – one just at Occidental a couple of days ago.
As a student of the Bible for over 50 years – and during which time many of my previous presumptuous presuppositions have been shattered – ‘dagod’ of this world is entirely capable of deceiving most folks, regardless of their self-declared immunity to being deceived. After all – deception is his entire game and none of us is exempt to Old Scratch appearing as an angel of light.
Anyways – it’s FYI – Enjoy!
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”
Here’s where I stopped reading-
“And I have no use for the nutjobs who think the way to save “Western civilization” is to expel all the brown people from Europe, North America, Australia, and wherever else they coexist with pallid Euro-wraiths.”
Because that is the way!
“Shakespeare is the root of “modern sensibilities.” You would be hard pressed to find any other body of work more formative of “modern sensibilities” than Shakespeare’s”
How would you know?
“Disclaimer: I’m not a typical conservative, much less a Western chauvinist. Au contraire, I’m a defector from “Western civilization” who agrees with Gandhi that it would be a good idea. What’s more, I’m a Moroccan resident and convert to Islam. I don’t hold it against my wife that she is female, Muslim, and less melanin-challenged than I am. And I have no use for the nutjobs who think the way to save “Western civilization” is to expel all the brown people from Europe, North America, Australia, and wherever else they coexist with pallid Euro-wraiths.”
You, self-conscious ‘pallid Euro-wraith,’ just cannot help yourself, can you? Panting with the eagerness of a convert to prove yourself and be accepted, by declaring yourself a rabid hater of what you write in contemptuous quotes as “Western civilization.”
I have heard the converts’ exertions of this type being compared (by sexist males, no doubt…) to the case of “flat-chested women who always try harder.”… You do try very hard.
You maculate your own writings with your compulsive proselytizing and performative acts of hatred for White, Western civilization.
Judaism is a horse of a different color. If one is serious, it’s extremely demanding, and given the inextricable racism of matrilineal privilege, a convert without it will always be treated as inferior, however sincere he may be.
Islam, however, includes no such element. I’ve been to Kosovar/Albanian mosques in America where the congregants are predominantly white, and I didn’t notice any ‘self-hating white traitor trash cucks’ among them. In principle, any people can adopt Islam as their own. The religion is top-heavy with ethical prescriptions that transcend race. All the stuff about child brides, polygamy, and ‘killing infidels’ is just cartoonish rot advanced primarily by jealous Jews who wish their own religion wasn’t as demanding.
Great piece that tells it all as it is.
‘you would have received many lectures about the magnificence and importance of Jewish writers like Isaac Babel and Saul Bellow, writers who are now justifiably forgotten.’ — Anon[398]
Yesterday I wandered the stacks of my public library. Just scanning the spines for author’s names, it was impossible to avoid noticing that probably a third of the works are by Jewish authors — meaning that they are over-represented by a factor of ten times or more.
Just now I searched the term ‘Jewish bias in publishing.’ Google AI won’t touch the verboten subject. But last year the New York Slimes weighed in with some standard, garment-ripping Jewish kvetching:
Try, if you will, to parse essayist James Kirchick’s warped worldview. Jewish domination of the publishing industry morphs into ‘enormous contributions’ [thanks to goyim being excluded].
Israel’s protracted mass murder and starvation of millions turns into ‘self defense’ against a one-day border raid by a few thousand ragtag Gazans.
And try to escape Kirchick’s double bind: if you brazenly ascribe Israel’s genocide to ‘Jews,’ they cry antisemitism. But if you employ the milder ‘zionist’ label (which includes a few zio-Christian freaks like US ambassador Mike Hucksterbee), they hear ‘Jew’ anyway.
Bottom line, you can’t win. With their congenital talent for inversion, Jews are always the victims, while those they trample are somehow the bad guys. Oy vey, what’s the use …
‘You maculate your own writings’ — ariadna
Sounds pretty twisted! So I had to look it up:
to mark with a spot or spots; stain.
“a dirty white T-shirt maculated with barbecue sauce”
Which calls up a whole other scene: hangin’ out with the bros watching sportsball on the TeeVee, swilling Bud Light, dishing on flat-chested women.
Then I blurt out, ‘You just maculated your T-shirt with barbecue sauce, dude.’
An arctic chill falls across the room, as everyone gives me the side-eye for spouting arcane vocabulary. Then I’m ushered to the door, booted out of the fraternity for performative polysyllabilism.
Oh well, back to my tubercular garret to read Kevin’s obsequious scribblings. 🙁
You deserve a Golden “Etruscan” star for this retort.
Nina Jankowicz is a public figure. You can say anything about, just about.
“ Why “settle” for one? Why not become an old-fashion Mormon and have as many wives as you please?”
I stick first and foremost to nature’s laws; men and women are about equal in numbers almost everywhere. But then it’s been so hard coping with only one. I leave the option of multi-wives to those who have the leader spirit in them for that could justify their possession of a harem.
“Typo, I hope….”
I cannot be so cynical. I did post the correction with apology.
Benjamin Netanyahu = Benzion Mileikowsky
David Ben-Gurion = David Grün
Levi Eshkol = Levi Shkolnik
Yigal Allon = Peikowitz
Yitzhak Rabin = Nehemiah Rubitzov
Yitzhak Shamir = Icchak Jaziernicki
Shimon Peres = Szymon Perski
Ehud Barak = Ehud Brog
Ariel Sharon = Ariel Scheinerman
Golda Meir = Goldie Mabovitch
Many Ashkenazi changed their first & last names because it sounded too Eastern European
Mr. Barrett,
no one killed the one called Jesus.
This one was neither a Jew-Aramaic nor a human. But a Deity of the kingdom of heaven.
No human can give birth to a Deity.
After having rehabilitated a human, when previously he suffered negativity and disease, and ostracism from his contemporaries, you personally believe that THEY / The Heavenly GODS would have let their Representative, their Envoy, die.
They were always present: …..when they tempted his righteousness in the desert, …. when as Sirens / Erinyes, they distracted him on the lake of Tiberias, … at the wedding of Canaan, …. on Golgotha, when the great Mother rested upon and … the night took over.
Death and Resurrection?!?!?!
Does anyone really think that THEY would have allowed such depravity!
… this ancient apocrypha, dating back to the first half of the 2nd century, reports the following……
… the soldiers …saw the heavens open and two individuals descending dressed in great splendor and approaching the tomb. The stone that was leaning against the door, rolling away from itself, moved aside to one side and the tomb opened, and both of these young men entered. When the soldiers saw this, they woke up the centurion and the elders, since they too were on guard. And while they were explaining to them what they had seen, …. again they saw 3 men come out of the tomb, and the 2 from before supported the other in the middle of them while a cross followed them, and the heads of the first 2 reached up to the sky, while that of the one they were leading by the hand, surpassed the heavens …
All religious texts are texts of MYTHOLOGY, all speak of a space/time plane in which Deities and humans coexisted, until we remained orphans of that GOLDEN AGE.
As for yahweh, a substantivized derivation, I see that it is in good company with Guyenot, who continues to reclaim it undaunted. Here it is the etymology, YWH, which is predominant, a noise, a sound, a hiss … produced by a machine in motion, in the act of proceeding on the ground.
In reality, it is a – phonosymbolism -, that is, the ability that certain terms / words have to arouse, with their sound, an image, a sensation or a meaning. In fact, becoming nouns / substantivized.
The MYTH shows itself and shows us the many aspects of existence, time and Space, expand over centuries and millennia, … but it is always there, motionless and imperishable….. is alive and ceaselessly reborn … it keeps comin back, .. time after time.
Indecipherable symbols, incoherent to us, have been floating in the air for millennia and millennia, an ancestral rationality has conceived them, as symbols they have come down to us and to others after us, until humanity will give them the right attention and discover that our future was already present in an atavistic and oblivious past, .. that our civilization is not unique, .. more advanced and developed races have already lived here. The immortal DEITS that mythologies tell us about in every corner of this insignificant asteroid, … come back to question us, .. when will we pay them more attention?
Let us not worry about the end of time, but let us rejoice in the new that is approaching, let us observe the signs and keep ourselves ready, and may … the wineskins always be full of oil, to show the way to … the LORD who comes.
How could I rationally accept the religious forms prevailing today, when my spirit sails towards these shores, waiting for the cycle of existence to conclude its path: only the MYTH, whose external garments conjugated in the – Primordial Symbols – contains the Eternal Truth of man and the world!
LE – V
I would put zero confidence in anything published by a Jew. Particularly relating to “historical” events, numbers, and victims, as proved by the 6 million holocaust fraud that no one is allowed to question for obvious reasons.
If any Persians were slaughtered, you can bet it was nowhere near 75,000.
One thing to keep in mind is that forensic cases often are vexed with compelling coincidences. There was, without a doubt, a Stratford family with the surname Shakespeare. There was a man, William Shakespeare, who was from Stratford, who had a munificent career in the London theater and who retired to Stratford.
The grammar school in Stratfors was not akin to a modern comprehensive public high school. It was more akin to a modern prep school in that there would have been no young men of low caliber in attendance there. As the son of a prosperous rural artisan who supplied to the local gentry and local titled classes, young Shakespeare would have had no problem getting into the school and getting his education paid for. During his youth, Shakespeare probably associated a great deal with the gentry and aristocratic classes.
That the Avon man was Shakespeare is not an idea I have any problem with. My operative thought is that we should not let our modern conceptions of authorship and intellectual property pollute our understanding of how the Shakespeare dramatic oeuvre was created. There was no television and no cinema in those days. Live theater was what stood in the place of television and cinema. The people who produced the plays were people with a job to do. I am sure they cared no more about exactly how their playscripts got written than does a modern television or movie production company care about exactly how a script is prepared.
There apparently is one surviving letter where the correspondent says that the Globe company is waiting for Shakespeare to complete the play he is working on. This points to the idea that there was an individual man known as Shakespeare who was the principal author of the Shakespearean dramatic corpus. It doesn’t tell us who he was but we do know that the Avon man was an historic person. His existence as such and his involvement in the London theater of that era are not matters of speculation.
Early on in your article, you self-identify as Muslim. That’s fine. Later on, multiple times in fact, you mock Judaism as ‘Bronze Age Mythology’. So if Judaism is Bronze Age Mythology, we can say Christianity is Iron Age Mythology. So we can clock your favorite bedtime story in as Late Iron to Classical Period Mythos.
What I really want to know is: How’d you manage to choose between idiocies? What makes one rational, the other laughable?
All civilizations are built atop mounds of skulls. Yes, indigenous peoples lived here before the conquistadors. Yes, Native Americans were displaced by our ancestors. But at one time, much of England belonged to the Pict and Germany to the Gauls. Shall we right the wrongs perpetrated by the Romans? Just how far back in time shall we extend your will to power? And if the Yeti ever did exist (no less plausible any other post Bronze Age legend), they were probably clubbed to death by some noble savage hoping to make the long cold winter nights safer for his children.
Since the first chimp picked up a stick and bashed his neighbor, we’ve been locked in a primal deathmatch. To point out—generations after the fact—that this or that land once belonged to some tribe or other is to state a trivial historical fact. It’s not a moral claim. Nothing follows from it, and certainly not entitlement.
Realpolitik I can respect. If someone says, “We want this land and we’re willing to fight for it”—fine. That’s honest. But to pose as a victim while plotting conquest? That’s not justice—it’s resentment masked by slick PR. It is, as Nietzsche once said of the fairer sex, ‘a pretty little made up lie.’
Exposure to Shakespeare is a given.Worthy of placing on a Pedestal. Iconic.And now we alter out understanding.
I am thankful I was exposed to Edward Abbey,Aldo Leopold,Garrett Hardin,Boulding.
And another personal aquaintance that ended up having a big chunk of the Florida Everglades named in his honor.( Conservation Area # 1 Arthur Marshall).The South Florida human population (Demographic) back then,my native childhood neighborhood,compared to now speaks volumes.
I like this article.
And moving illegals out is fine too,although Trump and The Jews will screw it up.
Thanks; that saves one from reading any further.
For the writer, nature and its truth seem not only subordinate but superfluous.
He seems self-satisfied with his brown ass, the child- & goat-fucker ideology I slam;
besides inviting as an alien other aliens to come and join him in an occupied country
as mindfucking beach bums under the rule of a sodomite king of Judaism,
who likes it not just backsides but likes it also in the arm,
while keeping his people extremely poor and illiterate and fostering crime and gangsterism for Judaism. But the people the writer is in contempt of are supposed to read his stuff.
Sodomite Jew King Moron Hassan of Morocco
(The sodomite sucker also emptied his worst jail population into the occupied remnants of Germany; a wet dream came true for Hassan’s sister, Polish Jewess Anjela Kasner-Kazmierczak aka Frau Doktor Merkel)
What most people miss about Shakespeare is that he was probably autistic, that is, an Aspie (a much better term than “autistic”). Here are a couple of sources for this theory:
OK, let’s assume for a minute that this theory is correct: Shakespeare was an Aspie. How does it apply to Barrett’s article above? Kevin writes: “Let’s start with the antisemitism. Everybody and his meshugganah brother-in-law knows that The Merchant of Venice is antisemitic, meaning anti-Jewish.”
Well, here’s the thing: if the Shakespeare-as-Aspie theory is correct, maybe we need to reinterpret the play and think about it not merely as “antisemitic”, but also as the reflection of an Aspie mind doing what Aspies do best: pattern recognition. Simon Baron-Cohen (yes, I know) wrote a book titled The Pattern Seekers which explains this well. Aspies not only see the pattern, they must yell it out to the world once they see it — and all social consequences of blurting out such inconvenient truths be damned. Aspies don’t care about social consequences: all they care about is TRUTH. Aspies are obsessed with TRUTH. And also with justice (it’s called “autistic justice sensitivity”).
So what I’m proposing is that …
Another Aspie trait evident in The Merchant of Venice is the tendency to interpret things literally, which is a typically Aspie thing to do. So Shylock interprets “a pound of flesh” to mean exactly that (maybe he was an autistic Jew himself), but he is out-Aspied by Portia, who interprets the law to the letter. Here is what Kevin wrote above:
What we have here is Aspieness cubed: Shakespeare the Aspie pattern-recognizes Jewish behavior (criminal usury, as usual); Shylock the Jew, an Aspie himself, wants a literal pound of flesh (literalism); and Portia applies an Aspie maneuver (uber-literalism) back on the Jew. Truth and Justice (both Aspie obsessions) are achieved, and thus Shakespeare the Aspie playwright is soothed by giving an Aspie closure to the play. Can’t get much Aspier than that.
That’s my theory, at least, and it could be applied to many other Aspie geniuses besides Shakespeare himself. Now, two other areas Kevin talks about are White Nationalism and Conspiracy Theory, areas which also attract and are influenced by Aspies. Maybe I’ll write about that in a separate comment.
I find it ironic that you pick the worst form of idiocy, Nihilism, and consider yourself “enlightened”.
The Plastic Age Mythology.
Existence without Essence.
The apotheosis of the Last Man.
Kevin, this is excellent analysis and writing (not sarcasm).
I was re-watching The Lord of the Rings Trilogy and noticed that dwarves are templates for Jews not demonized but disliked, ugly and obsessed with gold, but capable of heroism.
This is a funny scene:
Video Link
Your writing is cracking with intelligence. I am stealing this:
How’d you manage to choose between idiocies?
In fits of insomnia, I talk with ChatGPT for hours about these things. Opposed to that, a few weeks ago a Lowes Hardware Manager was openly prosetlyzing me because I teared up in the aisle over my mother dying. (Can’t talk about it- too much).
Anyway, I don’t think he meant harm, this Evangical Christian, but this is when he lost me utterly:
Me: But, you can’t look at any chimpanzee, any higher primate and deny evolution. Evolution is real.
Evangelical: No, that is a lie from demons.
Your brilliance: How’d you manage to choose between idiocies?
The part I can’t get over is the backward Hakenkreuz in the cover art. Must have been created by a Jew!
KB’s shallow, facile, adolescent readings of Merchant of Venice and King Lear reveal the general weakness of his thought. Thus everything else he sputters about is also kind of pointless.
I am usually struck by how consistently the people who deny the authorship of Will Shakespeare, also tend to read Shakespeare in a rather caveman way.
What do you call a Black school teacher who disparages the great literary works?
A Shakespearechucker.
What a wonderful idea! I’m all for it. Muzzies first, then we can worry about the rest.
How do you know death is final? You been there?
He was a black trans woman whose works were stolen through psychic white supremacy powers. Psychic white supremacy is the dominant explanation for black dysfunction, so it must be true
Anything good Whites did, was done by secret jews.
Anything bad Jews did, was the fault of Whites.
You see the same script today, with leftoid slaves like Chris Hedges blaming Israel’s actions on White racialists from the 18 century (and current year Whites, of course).
Once you know jewish tactics, it becomes so easy to see. I hate this reference, but it really is like Neo at the end of The Matrix. You don’t see the talking points, you just see the jewish code that wrote it. All my world is lines of code.
Most Americans believe Japan believe deserved to be nuked cuz of Pearl Harbor.
Does Israel deserve to be nuked for this?
Video Link
Muslims are vengeful, Yahweh-worshiping bastards. The better muzzie shills extol the virtues of revenge through Islam. You’re running on an old script, and I don’t feel like worshiping meteorite Yahweh. You realize Muhammad worshiped the jewish god, right?
There’s another thing Shakespeare did that is overlooked. He had two major black male characters in his dramtic corpus. These were Aaron in Titus Andronicus and Othello in the eponymous work.
Aaron was was sturdy and adaptable guy who eventually melted down in the face of the vexations and the disregard for his existence that he experienced. Othello was – everybody has been afraid see it let alone say it – a familiar man well-known in the American context. Excuse me, it’s been a long time since I have read the play or watched a video of a performance, but he was a little on the naive side, he had a weakness for women and the levels of treachery he was exposed to were a little over his head. His response, ultimately, was a paranoid meltdown.
When I call the baseball downfall of Barry Bonds Shakespearian, Othello is who I had in mind. Would Barry have stayed of the juice (PEDs)and had been willing to age gracefully in the game, in the end the dust would have settled, the truth would have rose and today Bonds would be a much-honored man in the history of American pro sports. Unfortunately, he let jealously rule him,
In the film Lakeview Terrace (2008), Samuel L. Jackson played an LAPD officer who went through an Othello-like descent in paranoia following the possibly preventable death of his wife following a traffic accident.
Speaking of Aspie-like pattern recognition, let’s ask that basic question. Did Shakespeare, right at the beginning of the modern era, see it like it is?
There’s an argument whether or not the character of Othello was intended to be seen as black. In American, casting a black actor as Othello is a long tradition. The character also can be represented as a North African, an Arab or a Turk. That’s in the theater though. In Titus Andronicus, Shakespeare referred to Aaron as a Moor. When Shakespeare said Moor, he meant a blackamoor or black African.
There were a few free black men in London in Shakespeare’s day. The age of exploration and discovery was already underway, and it was known that black Africans already had been in diaspora even in the ancient and Roman worlds.
Shakespeare must have been an aspie because he “recognized patterns” and saw Jewish behaviors that no one else saw?! Wow, I imagine there must have been legions of aspies in all the European history that made them kick out the Jews more than 100 times…They too “connected the dots.”
That’s all you got on the Bard being an aspie? Incredible pattern recognition?
I agree that Bobby Fischer was probably an aspie but he was far more than that: he was a genius chess player able to not only assess the given “pattern” on the chess board but also to work out all possible future moves and predict the outcome. He applied that to the world he lived in.
Aspies are generally unable to detach themselves from an obsessive focus on minute details of the given present pattern. I’ve known a few, one of them a child — a prodigy — whom I accompanied with his parents to a kindergarden they hoped to integrate him into in order to socialize him. When we arrived there were kids his age in the room sitting in a circle around the teacher who was using colorful balloons to tell a story. He gave them a brief indifferent glance and turned to the doorknob (a beautiful ornate bronze one) he proceeded to study, turn this way and that way. We could not detach him from it. He will make a great engineer but people, even kids his own age did not interest him.
I think the obsession of proving Shakespeare was someone else or something other than a genius is in fact a case of apophenia, deliberate in some cases, as is claiming that all major historical figures were in fact Jews or, conversely, that all critics of Jews/JP are irrationl “anti-semites.”
For a wonderful and surprising revelation of Shakespeare’s genius I recommend Borges’ “La Memoria di Shakespeare.” (Never translated into English but available in Italian.)
—
And if can stop being aspies for little while and set aside this Shakespeare preoccupation, perhaps we can talk about Israel having just attacked Iran with a barrage of missiles and announcing that they have targeted with maximum precision military objectives, political/religious leaders as well as Iranian scientists.
Marco Rubio put out a statement saying the US is not involved in this attack, it is only defending our interests/assets…
What, funding and arming Israel, and giving it intelligence? Oh, that? Well, the intelligence part is just something between Israel and Mjusk– a private entity
Also agreeing–more than likely– to let Israel attack first and then step in and do the hard work, when Iran responds and ‘harms our assets..’
Hey Kevin,
I love to go after you because you are such a Dufus, a clown show of ridiculous ideas and stupidity. The low of the low of whatever. You just are baseless.
So how are you liking the Chosen’s attack on the Shia regime? I am pretty sure the Jews will win. You just do not get it Kevin. Allah chose us because we are better than everyone else. You can’t get that thru your dense skull.
Allah unquestionably backs the Jews. If Hitler could not get rid of us, what you think Iran can??
Signed one of the chosen. He chose us for a reason. We are the voice of reason and moral authority. How stupid does the Shia Muslims look? What stupidity, just like you Kevin. Takes one to know one.
Signed,
One of the Chosen, superior in every way, especially from Islam.
Does Israel deserve to be nuked for this?
Why don’t you get busy with that Prissy. Go for it.
I’ll write US politicians a letter but they’ll be too busy sucking Zionist penises.
If Thomas Carlyle knew that Shakespeare was a Roman Catholic, then the people who originally decided to start pretending it was somebody else also most likely also knew it, and it stands to reason the imperative need to find someone else to attribute the works was that a Roman Catholic Shakespeare is too offensive to their psychology (and incompatible with their laughably bigoted view of the past).
The British and the Russians actually have a lot in common, which is why you’ll see Anglicans turn “Orthodox.”
They are both obsessed with lying about the past. The “deleted centuries” people (eg Fomenko) are just another iteration of the Francis Bacon kooks. The need to delete history, which is picking up speed as the English speaking world has become culturally dominant, extends to changing the races of the people who lived in the past. The people who think Great Britain is at the heart of European civilization don’t know what civilization is.
Hang on Jewipedia…weren’t the Jews expelled till Cromwell, the former Blessed Age covered by this period?
If so, she’d have well and truly been undercover, not with the high profile as described. Yes?
Were there ‘anti-semites’ when there were no Jews to stimulate the feelings?
Just askin’.
Yes, yes…
Barrett is a self-confessed, what those who lived in Outback Australia called, a “Gin Jockey”…though with the latter there was often some justification.
How else could he acquire ‘young (hirsute) muff’, so apparently prized by our beloved Western ‘elites’ than by the ‘Sacred Act of Conversion’? Given that he’s a most uninteresting, boorish, PLAIN expression of European humanity (a term used broadly).
Rather like the vile little George Galloway who’s now into (well f**k me) his fourth?
Both are disgusting, presumptive, traitors, a proposition that can be well imagined if we roll out the present into the not-so-distant future…for where will this social shit stand “when the trooper’s on the tide”?
Video Link
Oh and this…
Video Link
Looking at all those white bodies including hands and arms of Hezbollah fighters – Palestinians…
…reminds me of the Aryan trail, which I know not from readings but my own travels down the Blue Danube to the Black Sea and also down to Greece. Once an almost shocking experience was to see a busload of Fresians get out at a marketplace in Bulgaria – very confusing… It turned out to be a busload of Bulgarian farmer couples on an excursion.
The chewers’ „Nazi“ scold is supposed to be the devils’ original acronym for natives of Nazareth – Aryans; Nazi Jesus is white, light, bright; That too is neither from readings nor halucinations.
Je suis ignores us when devouring like wolves our brothers and sisters.
(Vegetarianism defeats Judaism)
You’re such a piss weak – contemporary – French piece of shit.
A real coward.
I suspect my Huguenot ancestors were the real patriots.
So the woman who came up with the theory was educated in a school set up by Lyman Beecher’s daughter. Lyman Beecher was stridently Anti-Catholic. Thomas Carlyle strongly insinuates, if he does not directly say, that William Shakespeare was a Roman Catholic. That’s published in 1841. In 1845 the idea comes to her that Shakespeare wasn’t Shakespeare.
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Delia-Salter-Bacon
A feminist abolitionist type. The masonic nutjobs spread the lie that Francis Bacon wrote the plays of Shakespeare, because to accept Shakespeare for who he really was undercuts their whole system of lies about history.
In 1856, for unknown reasons, she abandoned her plan of opening Shakespeare’s grave to look for certain documents she believed would support her position.
She knew what the epitaph says, so her perverse inclination is to open the grave. Radar suggests the skull is missing. Probably stolen by Freemasons.
Queen Esther is ecstatic right now as everything appears to be going the chosen’s way.
But as far as being superior. They are indeed far superior in one respect, being diabolical.
That’s why they are indeed chosen people… chosen by Satan.
a lot of the points he raises are very good, however, l didnt marry a brown bitch, l didnt convert to some useless religion. is the guy a white sellout? yes. his stats regarding white demographics past and present are way out – but you already know that. the author has a pleasant manner – but what does that hide? the author trades on his white genetic inheritance – to subvert white identity. his references to white history are blinkered photo snaps – white europeans did not perceive themselves as ‘white’ because there was little to compare themselves to and because they were superior to non whites they encountered anyway – there was no need to proclaim their superiority.
the author has done himself a dis service – to the benefit of his audience – now we know where he sits in the pantheon re the great replacement – what a dick
the author is a white sellout, you may as well praise a goat. are you a white man?
You don’t read very carefully. I like the white race, would be happy if it took Shakespeare’s advice and resumed reproducing, and have suggested that more whites converting to Islam could be part of the solution. Historically, the one notable Islamic society with a major white component, al-Andalus, was a world-renowned marvel. For at least a couple of centuries there were more books in one library in Cordoba than in all of non-Islamic Europe put together.
Islam, with its non-anthropomorphic approach to God, is far more compatible with perennial wisdom, philosophy, comparative mysticism, skeptical modernity, and just plain common sense than the earlier, primitive, now-outmoded monotheisms. Don’t let the Zionists plant an anti-Islam chip in your brain—research the other side of the story for yourself. Free online texts:
The Vision Of Islam (Murata and Chittick)
The Venture of Islam (Hodgson)
Review of The Ornament of the World (Menocal)
if l was out of shape and retarded l would convert to some useless judaeic religion and get me a maid. and thor would smote me
Jews have been reading for 3500 years while Arabs played in sand lots. Functionally illiterate like your Prophet.
It does not take a rocket scientist to see that ME Islam is stuck in the stone age. There are more patents, innovations and Nobel Laureate in one year by Jews, then in Islams lifetime. Once upon a time Islam was alive and thriving. but not now.
Now those Genius Arabs in Gaza spent all their $$ building tunnels that has completely destroyed the Aquifer of the entire land, uninhabitable, not by bombs but by their tunnels.
Why did they build those tunnels? Oh yeah to practice child sacrifice. What intelligence. And you defend them.
Sorry. Not consistent with the Elliot Rodger revolution. What else does anyone need to know?
Maybe not. Maybe the sister wives just kind of form a collective and live happily ever after. Not like it doesn’t still happen here and we don’t have evidence about how it works out.
It takes a deaf, dumb and blind fantasist, to love another deaf, dumb and blind fantasist. Just like the nihilist Mullah’s in Iran. Complete fantasy Jew hatred. What were they thinking? How hopelessly stupid. Sounds familiar I bet. Kevin the idiot. Laurent the pretend intellectual. Manipulate till your hearts content. You are on the wrong side.
Maybe it was the Persians that killed Kennedy. 9/11 anyone. False flag. You boys are hysterically funny with your plots. If only the Jews were not around.
Don’t mock the French. They may stink at the big stuff. But they excel at the little game. A few sharp treacherous men, and the women who run with them, can do a lot.
“One of the Chosen, superior in every way,”
Superior in every way — except for art, architecture, music, city planning, philosophy, civilization building, seafaring, airplane-inventing, skyscraper-building, cinema- and radio-inventing, railroad inventing and building, inventing modern mathematics and science… well pretty much everything except for swindling, criminal rackets, war-mongering, slave-dealing, child trafficking, and the creation of library after library full of racist, hate-filled, supremacist religious arcana.
You boast of all those patents and scientific innovations: every single last one of them based on the titanic, world-changing work of the filthy despicable goyim.
Now piss off and go scheme to steal another pension fund, tapeworm.
Is Kevin a Muslim because he looked at the evidence and independently concluded he should, for example, bow toward that cube thing 5 times a day? Or did he become one and then ask an imam “okay, so what do I believe?”
“Why did they build those tunnels? Oh yeah to practice child sacrifice.”
Under the Brooklyn synagogue, ranting yenta?
Reading up on Italian genetics, I always wondered why they are genetically similar. I always wondered why the Aquiline nose (Roman nose) is prevalent in both Italians and Ashkenazi Jews. Though, it looks better on Italians.
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/01/29/southern-italians-and-ashkenazi-jews-what-is-the-connection/
The Cohens are a Jewish scam. They are converted Italians pretending to be ancient Jews, like the rest:
The Kohen are traditionally believed, and halakhically required, to be of direct patrilineal descent from the biblical Aaron (also Aharon), brother of Moses, and thus belong to the Tribe of Levi.
Even members of this Kohen priestly group have Roman ancestry:
Semitic Anti-ism is the cause of Antisemitism.
I stood and looked at France this morning. From the West Cliff, bearing eastward across the greeny-blue of the English Channel, the chalky heights of the Pas-de-Calais are clearly visible to the naked eye (except for when sea mists occlude the view.) I live just 22 miles from France.
We may not speak the same language and we haven’t always been friends but it’s the same bitter south-westerly winds that wrinkle men’s faces on both sides of the strait and the same mucky terrain of gault clay, sandstone and chalk that we tread.
This is a very clever and well written article. It’s unfortunate the author resorts to low class language like “scum”, which detracts from the quality of the prose. But amazingly the entire article is built on a very cleverly concealed lie.
Barrett dismisses the idea of E Michael Jones to forcibly convert all Jews to Catholicism. I think that would be a great idea, but unfortunately the Catholic Church renounced Jewish evangelism, let alone forced conversion, after Vatican ii. Barrett then advocates that white people abandon Christianity and become Muslim. And here’s where the LIE enters.
The two great conspiracies Barrett speaks about, the JFK assassination and the 9/11 terror attack, both involve a process of reframing what is apparent by unraveling intricate devious conspiracies underlying the apparent events. So with 9/11 it seemed obvious that planes flew into the buildings knocking them down. But the conspiracy theorists cranked out millions of pages of speculation over the last 20 years to create an entirely different scenario.
This is exactly what Muslims have done with Christianity. The Gospels state plainly that Jesus was crucified in a conspiracy of Jewish and Roman leaders to execute him. And he rose from the dead three days later, revitalizing his discouraged followers to become ardent missionaries and evangelists who, in the span of 40 years, brought the Christian message to nearly every corner of the known world: from Spain in the west to India in the east.
But the Islam Barrett propounds tells its unfortunate followers that Jesus was never crucified. He was never the atonement for human sin and depravity. Rather he was raptured to heaven supernaturally while the traitor Judas was killed in his place. And therefore Jesus was not raised from the dead either.
One could argue that Islam is by nature a massive conspiracy theory. Coming along 700 years after Jesus, Islam has the chutzpa to tell Christians that their sacred texts are wrong (corrupted) and now Muhammad can reveal to them the real truth. Islam gives conspiracy theories a bad name because it so obviously misapprehends and falsifies the original Christian story.
Given the deception of Islam regarding Christianity — its effort to recast the essential events of the Christian story 700 years later — it would be fair and logical to assume that a devout adherent of this duplicitous faith, as Barrett claims to be, also is wrong about the JFK assassination and the 9/11 attacks.
This is where Barrett is being forced to choose. Is his devotion to the truth about these two latter-day conspiracies sufficient to overwhelm his devotion to the false conspiracy theory of Muhammad? We can only encourage him to courageously renounce the false faith Islam. It will be a blessing to have someone of his intellectual caliber and eloquence fully on the side of the Way the Truth and the Life: Jesus of Nazareth Messiah of Israel and Savior of the World Amen.
chosen by Satan.
The vanity of the Jews is such that they much prefer the role of henchmen to “the Prince of this World” to that of the suffering servant of God.
LOL!
I visited Morocco once for six weeks in the summer of 1984; the Moroccans there, and elsewhere, were the shittiest people I’ve ever met. Till this day, after visiting about 100 countries since visiting Morocco, Morocco remains the shittiest country I’ve ever visited: a country full of thieves and liars, sprinkled with degenerate homos.
Moroccan immigrants/”refugees”in Europe:
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/634073/Cologne-sex-attacks-migrants-Moroccan-North-African-Syrian-refugees-PEGIDA
https://brusselssignal.eu/2024/07/cologne-police-sees-rise-of-extreme-violence-connected-to-mocro-mafia/
In 2011, on New Year’s Day, I moved to Brussels, a city full of Moroccans, and lived there for over a decade. Brussels, thanks to its 35% Muslim population, was the shittiest city I’ve ever lived in. It was also the city where, by far, I’ve been in the most fistfights. And all of those fights, surprise surprise, were with young, turd-world, Moroccan punks whom I witnessed abusing/beating non-Muslim women or old men.
Christopher Marlow wrote all
True, I am sure. What about the thought though that the French excel at the little game?
Well then, do not bother to visit the second largest Turkish city after Istanbul: Berlin…
William Burroughs disagrees
Now you tell me…I was planning on visiting my niece who’s a ballerina in Berlin.
Ah, Sick Willy. Morocco was right up that pederast’s ass/alley: renting boys for a few silver dimes must have been heaven on earth for that obscenely degenerate junky.
Jeu de boules?
https://www.ncregister.com/blog/evidence-shakespeare-catholic
Video Link
Funny quips and many salient points. One of the better essays I have read by Kevin Barrett.
Three objections:
1.
This is obviously a lie. He could try to argue it is not the “main problem” or some such. But to discount the mass migration of millions of people in short order as without consequence is daft or duplicitous. And since Barrett knows the Great Replacement is a demographic reality as well as an intentional agenda being orchestrated by Jewish Power, this denial borders on the egregious.
2.
I must not understand because Barrett seems to be confusing Regan and Goneril with Good King Lear. It is the modern day corrupt Regan and Goneril who got most upset with the very idea of DOGE.
3.
That is a generous offer. But I do not want to become another straw in Judea’s broom. Rather, please reconvert to Christianity. If you wife truly loves you, she will stay.
I was thinking of baseball, a sport that is popular in North America, Latin America and the Far East. In baseball, everyone today plays for long ball, the home run which clears the bases and scores runs two and three at a time. Little ball refers to the style of baseball which emphasizes getting runners on base, baserunning and getting multiple hits in a row to score runs.
In guerre, the big game is mass warfare. The little game means espionage and intelligence operations. I was alluding to the idea that the French are poor at mass warfare but are excellent at intelligence and special operations.
What did I say? A few sharp treacherous men, and the women who run with them, can do a lot.
Here in Europe we’re facing the same threat. Everything that belongs to indigenous whites is being handed over to Third World invaders. And instead of thanking us, they’re killing us.
Back to Will for a second…
I was just randomly flipping through Romeo and Juliet, and came upon by chance the delightful little eloquent sort of sing-song bit between Paris and Capulet (I.ii, 4-34).
How anyone can think that that was written by a self-hating drunk (Greene), a high-flown too-busy scholar (Bacon), an arrogant half-wit courtier (de Vere), a jealous weirdo (Jonson) or a dead guy (Marlowe) is beyond me.
Listen to it, or read it. It was written by a practical man of the theater, who was just sort of starting to feel his oats as a poet as well as a you-gotta-get-paid playwright. Do you morons think that Neil Simon didn’t write Neil Simon? Or that Lanford Wilson didn’t write “Burn This” and “The Hot L Baltimore”?
Sometimes things that are obvious are in fact obvious.
Hey Kevin,
I would love to do another podcast with you, this time focusing on Shakespeare. The reason there is so much confusion concerning the plays’ authorship is because no one had the slightest idea what they meant until I wrote Shakespeare’s Secret Messiah.
Here’s a bon bon to chew on.
“For brave Macbeth (well he deserves that name),
Disdaining Fortune, with his brandished steel,
Which smoked with bloody execution,
Like Valor’s minion, carved out his passage
Till he faced the slave;
Which ne’er shook hands, nor bade farewell to him,
Till he unseamed him from the nave to th’ chops,”
MacBeth, 1, 2
The reason Macbeth – who “unseamed” his opponent – “deserves” his name is because it is a pun based upon the Hebrew word ‘machbereth’ – Strong’s 4225 – meaning a seamed or sewed piece.
The pun demonstrates that the author understands Hebrew and is the entire reason for the play’s mysterious focus upon sewing. Further, if you don’t understand the pun you can’t understand the play.
If you are interested, please contact me at [email protected]
Joe Atwill
Or that I didn’t write, if you wish for something and you get it, don’t complain.
The pertinent question is, everywhere in the Western world, who is always behind abortion, homosexuality, feminism, race-mixing, and mass Non-White immigration?
There are many reasons why, throughout recorded history, these people have been expelled from just about every country they have ever dwelled in.
Shaky, my man!!
Shakespeare was a cosmic genius. Naturally he was antisemitic.
The disclaimer was akin to a freshly evacuated turd, placed atop a piping hot meal I’ve yet to take a single spoon full of.
“And I have no use for the nutjobs who think the way to save “Western civilization” is to expel all the brown people from Europe, North America, Australia, and wherever else they coexist with pallid Euro-wraiths”
Once that steaming turd hove in to view, the rest of the meal figuratively went in the nearest trash receptacle. This composition is a betrayer, trying to live inside his own wretched skin, by creating a facade that there is deep thought and much pondered activity surrounding his personal arseholery. There isn’t, it’s just the long known behaviour of those who still find their own involuntary betrayal towards their kin deeply uncomfortable, so they cloak it in displays of chin in hand, single eyebrow raised, hyper deepity ponderationisms and the cleveristic thoughterations that bursterate out of the aether, on to the page.
I used to go surfing in Morocco in the early 90’s and met the types that would have their insubstantial little souls get swept up by the merest zephyr of foreign culture wafting by and they’d be carried off in a slow and embarrassing to witness betrothal to it.
This is that….
Excellent article, the very best I have read in a long time.
” I think I die nowhere so content as in the king’s company, his cause being just and his quarrel honorable”