RSS
This video is available on Rumble, Bitchute, Odysee, Telegram, and X.
I think the Civil Rights Act of 1964 has caused more damage to the United States than any other law — except one. And that one — here’s a hint — was passed one year later, in 1965.
The Civil Rights Act banned private-sector discrimination. An employer can’t reserve jobs only for whites or men, say, and a restaurant or hotel can’t refuse to serve people because of race, sex, religion, national origin, etc. The Civil Rights Act is back in the news because last week — 61 years after it was passed — the US Supreme Court finally decided that its protections apply equally to whites and men and heterosexuals, not just to the liberals’ favorites.
The case was brought by a woman who worked for the Ohio Department of Youth Services. Just look at its home page. I count just one white man here, and “career opportunities” in the bottom left shows two black women.
The department is sure to be full of loonies. Marlean Ames, who brought the case, is a white heterosexual.
She was denied a promotion, which went instead to a black lesbian named Yolanda Frierson.
Plaintiff Marlean was then demoted — that was a $40,000 a year pay cut — and her replacement was a young homosexual named Alex Stojsavljevic, who had been her protégé.
The direct supervisor who demoted Marlean was Genine Trim, a black lesbian.
Ryan Gies, who was also involved in the decisions, is a white hetero, and Julie Walburn, also involved, is another white hetero.
Marlean Ames sued, claiming she was mistreated because she is heterosexual — although I suspect being white didn’t help either. The Oho trial court and the appeals court recognized that if she had been a minority — black or lesbian — her complaint would be strong enough to file suit, but since she was not a minority, she had to have better arguments: She had to show “background circumstances to support the suspicion that the defendant is that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority.”
The theory is that discrimination against whites or men or heteros is so rare, so improbable, so unlikely that plaintiffs must have additional evidence of this scarcely believable man-bites-dog claim. This is absurd. For years, anti-majority discrimination has been widespread, often obligatory. That’s what affirmative action and DEI are all about.
The Supreme Court ruling noted that added proof to support a claim of discrimination against a majority person could be “evidence that a member of the relevant minority group [here, gay people] made the employment decision at issue, or with statistical evidence showing a pattern of discrimination . . . against members of the majority group.”
Since Marlean Ames didn’t cite that kind of evidence, her case had been dismissed.
Justice Katanji Brown Jackson — yes, that very one, here covered with cowrie shells — wrote the *unanimous* decision finding in Marlean Ames’s favor.
Justice Jackson wrote that this additional burden for majority members was never in the law and was cooked up by courts. The Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination against everyone equally. This ruling doesn’t mean that Marlean Ames wins her suit; only that it can go forward. If Ohio Youth Services convinces a jury that she was demoted because she was no good at her job — and not because she was hetero — she’ll get nothing.
Still, this is a victory for white people. In the past, it wasn’t impossible for whites to win discrimination cases, but this makes it easier.
When the Civil Rights Act banned discrimination in 1964, we were already supposed to believe that black people were just as smart and hard-working as white people, and the only thing holding them back was racism. Without discrimination, blacks would blossom. They didn’t, because they aren’t as smart and hard-working, so their status hardly changed: They were still more likely to be poor, on welfare, and in jail, and less likely to be doctors or astronomers.
And so, very quickly, we got perverse outcomes. It was illegal to discriminate against blacks. But the only way a company could prove it wasn’t discriminating was to hire a bunch of them, even if they were incompetent. If you didn’t hire blacks, the government would shout “racism” and drag you through the courts. That’s how a law that was supposed to require equal treatment ended up, in many cases, requiring equal outcomes and intentional discrimination.
Anyone — as I did — who pointed out that the problem wasn’t “racism,” but race differences in abilities or temperament was called a hate monger: kicked off social media, debanked, death threats. Since it was verboten to talk about the real reasons for black failure, the country spent 60 years dreaming up increasingly idiotic ways to blame white people: systemic racism, institutional racism, white privilege, unconscious racism.
Math is racist, music theory is racist, being on time is racist, bird-watching is racist because not enough black people watch birds.
And, of course, it’s the police who make black people commit crimes, so we have to get rid of the police.
All this justified blatant, anti-white hiring policies, DEI, and the preposterous idea that discrimination against whites is so rare that white plaintiffs need more proof of it than non-whites.
Hispanics and American Indians and immigrants and homosexuals and transexuals quickly became certified victims of the white-supremacist, hetero-normative, phallocratic, ablest power structure, in which people like me ruthlessly exploit and oppress everyone else without even trying.
So, yes, this is a good court decision: People like me can claim discrimination, just like all the people I’m supposed to be grinding down.
But the real problem is still a triple-padlocked taboo. I want Donald Trump to appoint a blue-ribbon committee to gather the data on race differences in IQ, time preference, criminality, and mental illness, and explain how nutty it is to expect every racial group to end up at the same level, and how *vicious* it is constantly to blame white people for things that aren’t our fault.
Imagine how the media would prance and roar and howl. But they’d be forced to deal with facts most Americans have never heard. It would be a wonder to behold.
Does Mr. Trump have the backbone for that? No. But it’s a pleasant thought, isn’t it?
Next week, I think I’ll make a video on why the Civil Rights Act of 1964 should — or maybe shouldn’t — be repealed.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
LOL! Sue all you want. White men are still the lowest form of life in the United States under the US Constitution.
So many dumb Brits still l6ove this bumbling twit!!!
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DKoe1kyuAXr/?igsh=dXA4NTNkcGRnZzIz
Jackson is not only an embarrassment to the robes, but to blacks with an average IQ. One of 4 DEI hires on the SC – she is not quite as illiterate as Sotomayor – whose commentary on covid and murderous shot was a humiliating choice for intelligent Latinos.
Then there is Kagan – our token Jewess. Be glad they are down to “tokens” rather than out and out theft of everything they touch – with the use of name changes and Ashkenazi looks.
Finally – ACB – the Federalist DEI choice – who, along with compromised Roberts claim the distinction as Lepers with the most fingers.
And we are stuck with this bunch – unless intelligent blacks and Hispanics look at impeachment to correct the error of hitherto imprudent DEI hires. – Better looking nags in their glue factory.
True life example of the racist anti-white efforts to hobble the Caucasoid ability to sue.
Black guy at one corporation I worked at sued for black discrimination. Was awarded a ‘life changing’, ghetto lottery $20,000
White guy in finance accuses his hedge fund management employer of anti-white discrimination, and was awarded $10 million dollars.
Damned Affirmative action and DEI! Keeping the white man down since……………..never.
“Black guy at a corporation” “White guy in finance”
Way to anecdotally cherry pick the janitor versus someone from the C-Suite. Let’s compare the education levels and overall compensation packages of these two employees then, shall we?
Weak sauce Troll.
Which corporation?
Which hedge fund?
The Civil Rights Act of 1964, along with the Social Security Act and the ADA, are in “Title” 42 of the United States Code. No part of that “Title” is STATUTORY LAW.
And by the way, governments CANNOT confer RIGHTS on ANYBODY. They can confer and revoke PRIVILEGES, not RIGHTS!! Of course, in this country overflowing with phone-staring imbeciles and an entirely criminal federal government, does it really matter? Probably not. And by the way, ANIMALS have ZERO LEGAL RIGHTS!! The fact that I have to point this stuff out means that the Communist public school system in this country should be blown up root and branch, and the ashes put in a giant waterproof container and shot into outer space. Just sayin’.
US population:
White females: 112 million (out of a total of 212 million whites)
Blacks: 41 million
Latinos: 65 million (includes “white Hispanic”)
Asians/Pacific Islanders: 21 million
Jews: 8 million (Jews are categorized as racially white)
Muslims: 5 million (Muslims are categorized as racially white)
Indians: (from India) 5 million
Native Americans: 3 million
LGBTQ+ 13 million (most would be categorized as white, and most are male)
Total 273 million
Total US population 340 million
Total white heterosexual males (not Jewish, not Muslim, not Latino/Hispanic) 67 million
So, 67 million Americans are presumed to be oppressing 273 million other Americans. But somehow, they’ve been deemed the “majority” and have had to meet a higher standard in order to prove that they’ve been discriminated against.
The figure of only 67 million heterosexual white males in the US is shocking, but you have to take into account the overlaps. The following are my estimates:
Latinos: 9 million heterosexual “white males.”
Jews: 3.8 million heterosexual “white males.”
Muslims: 2.5 million heterosexual “white males.”
LGBTQ: 8 million white males, non-hetero.
Total 23.3 million categorized as “white male.” Add to the 67 million actual white males who are heterosexual. Total: 90.3 million. There are also “white female” overlaps in the Latino, Jewish, Muslim and LGBTQ groups, which would account for the rest of the discrepancy between the total white population figure and combined “white male” and “white female” populations.
To conclude, 19.7% of the US population has been considered “the majority” and deemed to be oppressing the other 80.3% of the population (“the minority”). This is what happens when you allow the Jews to take over your country.
janitor versus someone from the C-Suit
I never mentioned what the black guy’s job was TrueJackass.
Wahhhhhh!!!!! I’m a white man and I am severely discriminated against (somehow) and neutered by low IQ negroes (who somehow, despite being low IQ, manage to outsmart my high white IQ)
Let’s compare the education levels and overall compensation packages of these two employees then, shall we?
Why don’t you use your education to sniff between the legs of some high priced Vegas whore (who is white of course) having a fatal case of ‘twat rot’. You can model the last minutes of your halfwitted life same as ‘Mr. 10 Million’ before your eyes rollback in a ‘mustard gasish’ sensual orgy.
Wahhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Which corporation?
Which hedge fund?
Hi Eric!
Here is some solid advice so you can maximize your high white IQ………………..
Why don’t you use the magic AI of your cutting edge sexbot to Find The FUCK OUT?
‘I’s sowwy Massa Erics, I don be doin allllllllll da hard wok fo yoos no mo! Taka dem minty’s julops and shov’em up yo pastee anuses’
*dong my version of ‘Old Man River’
‘Old Whitey River…………………….WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!’
“Why don’t you use the magic AI of your cutting edge sexbot to Find the FUCK OUT?”
I googled “white plaintiff awarded $10 million in racial discrimination lawsuit against hedge fund” and came up with nothing.
That’s why I asked you to name the hedge fund, stupid.
So go ahead and name it.
Or admit you’re a liar who made the whole thing up.
If you made that assumption on most of the posters who come to Unz.com you would, almost always, win.
But not today.
https://nypost.com/2021/10/27/white-exec-who-sued-for-reverse-discrimination-wins-10m-suit/
ServesyouallWhite wrote, “White guy in finance accuses his hedge fund management employer of anti-white discrimination and was awarded $10 million dollars.” (bolding mine).
I asked him which hedge fund. (bolding mine).
That question still hasn’t been answered.
So, your defense of ServesyouallWhite fails.
Video Link
I googled “white plaintiff awarded $10 million in racial discrimination lawsuit against hedge fund” and came up with nothing.
Ah Google, the 99%’er nitwit’s best friend.
Or admit you’re a liar who made the whole thing up.
Ummm, No.
In my most high IQ white benevolence, let me help your short yellow bussed ass out:
So, the white executive who actually was awarded the $10 million, was not a privileged hedge funder, but a hospital executive.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/reverse-racism-white-male-executive-10-million/
So a privileged white bastard (already making a fortune) executive of a crooked healthcare system dominated by whites, ‘wah’ed’ about anti-white//DEI discrimination and was awarded a cool $10 million
Of course Fagric, your high white IQ failed to extrapolate my statement into possible variations.
And what is worse, is that the white guy actually was not ‘a vaunted white financial wizard ‘of the highest breeding’ as True Blue implied in his comment.
What else, what else? Well beelow me down! Here is another white who sued their way into a permanent pay day-
https://abcnews.go.com/Business/starbucks-discrimination-lawsuit-awarded-white-employee-25-million/story?id=100104620
$25.6 million for the white woman ganged up on by anti-white evil doers.
Anti-white/DEI bellyaching by 99%’er whites is absolute bullshit.
The only exception is the white replacement by Indians, which 99%’er whites encouraged and enabled.
But to use a racial analogy towards the above, I am not giving sympathy to some ‘white kid’ who vountarily huffed wood glue and now has irreversible brain damage.
So, your defense of ServesyouallWhite fails.
The only failure is you Eric Blowsthem, it is neither Truth’s nor my fault that your defective, yet somehow high IQ brain is permanently stuck on linear.
That question still hasn’t been answered.
Says the fucktard still waiting on answers about Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny’s actual home addresses.
What’s ironic is that it was a white jew owned and controlled movie company that produced and financed that movie about a goy white wonderland, only for goy whites to have allowed jew whites to completely destroy any chance of said goy white wonderland.
Here is the new attack on white males.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-19/history-naming-body-parts-anatomy-men/105426140
“So, the white executive who actually was awarded the $10 million, was not a hedge fund trader, but a hospital executive.”
So, you were wrong when you said he was a “white guy in finance” who “accused his hedge fund management employer of anti-white discrimination.” Check.
“[You] failed to extrapolate my statement into possible variations.”
Why should I do that?
” … permanently stuck on linear.”
Wow! So, what great insights can you give us with your non-linearity?
Gosh, you must be full of revolutionary, earthshaking ideas and filled with deep, profound truths only people like you can discern.
You’re like Einstein!
Lay in all on us, dude! I’m waiting to have my mind blown!
Oh, but wait a sec while I get my ayahuasca.
Golly, I’m so excited! I’m going to call that Shaman guy my friend recommended.
And, and, I gotta find my old copies of Carlos Castaneda’s The Teachings of Don Juan, A Separate Reality and The Eagle’s Gift!
Right on!!!
Well sorta.
I watched a documentary that said something quite interesting about movies once.
I have watched HUNDREDS of classic black and white movies from about 1935-1960 or so, and in the romantic movies there is always this view of, as you said; goy white wonderland.
I had always assumed that the Jewish movie moguls went to small towns and took their ideas for these movies from small towns around America.
WRONG!
According to the doc. It was the opposite, many small white towns across America built their town squares, had their square dances, their social meetings, etc. along the lines of what they had seen in movies.
Ergo, Jews CREATED what we call the white middle class, because remember, prior to movies, there were no . suburbs, inner cites were a place for poor immigrants and business people, and PRACTICALLY EVERYONE worked for himself.
“I watched a documentary that said something”
Well see, there’s your problem right there at the git-go.
Video Link
Well as never, you sure straightened me out……………did I mention the word ‘never’?
ANYHOW, HERE IS thee actual ‘soon to be’ white financial guy who will most likely win $10 million, probably much much more.
https://www.investmentnews.com/independent-broker-dealers/edward-jones-hit-with-lawsuit-claiming-discrimination-against-white-advisors/259708
But Eric, since I know you will take the opposite sideof anything I say, read the following carefully…………..
DO NOT, DO NOT, move near a 1st strike targeted U.S. military base. You do not want to be horribly vaporized by a nuclear blast.
Well, as never, you “fixed my wagon” by mentioning a white finance guy who “will most likely win $10 million, probably much more” in his lawsuit against Edward D. Jones and Co., L.P.
But the article you referred me to — if you read it all the way to the end, which you apparently did not — says a black guy received a $34 million settlement in a discrimination lawsuit against Edward Jones in 2021.
In Gratton v. UPS, a black delivery driver won $39 million. In 2000, a black received a $192 million settlement against Coca Cola. In Harris v. FedEx Corporate Services, a black received a jury award of $365 million, but that award was later tossed on appeal.
So, we have a black winning $192 million, another winning $39 million and a third winning $34 million. Got any whites winning comparable amounts?
Oh, but dem poor po colored folks, dey don’t get nuttin and dem white debils get everything. LOL
Video Link
What a lucky bastard THAT GUY was!
Weh, now, dat jes proves yo case dat de blacks is bein oppreshuned sho nuf!
Cosn, we won’t pay no tenshun to dem uther cases which blacks wun muney.
Uncle Remus, welcome to the thread.
Of course whites can sue for discrimination. The Civil rights Act was clarified by explicit legislative intent when Congress ratified The ICCPR. It’s there in black and white in the Congressional Record: the convention is US law – as DoJ continually declares in the most public forums in the world. Articles 4 and 26 disallow discrimination solely on the ground of race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.
The Federalist Society brainwashes US judges to bend over backwards avoiding any mention of that binding state commitment but in a pinch you can drag it into court by calling two witnesses, one on the facts and one on the law. Any judge refusing that request guarantees you an appeal. If every higher court blows you off you can then go over the head of the state to treaty or charter bodies where states and elected experts call the USG on the carpet. This public international humiliation and disgrace is arguably the only spur to reform in the US.
Let’s say you present probative statistical evidence of discrimination against you in favor of Jews in elite higher education. By law it makes no difference if you’re white. You didn’t have to wait for crooked hack Supreme Court assholes to give you a precedent.