The What-If’s make for interesting historical debate. Few developments were inevitable in history, though plenty of events were more likely than not to happen. There were forks along the road, and the current history in which we live is the product of the paths that were taken by those in power.
‘History’ in the generic sense means the documented/recorded and analyzed story of just about anything, e.g. the history of some small town called Bumbleville with the population of 200, the history of fly-fishing, the history of toy-making, and etc. But in the grand sense, History means the Story of Power, and for good or for ill, a small handful of people got to decide the fates of mankind.

If Current History is the product of what is remembered, it is as much, if not more so, about what has been forgotten or is (consciously)repressed. In a way, it’s like the workings of the human mind, a storage of countless details of events, incidents, and eccentricities of our lives.
However, depending on our profession and/or purpose, we tend to focus solely on those things that are of relevance to our needs in the here-and-now. Suppose someone suffered a trauma as a victim. If he’s in the military as a leader of a squadron, he’ll likely push his self-pitying victim-narrative to the back-burner as he must exude strength and confidence. However, if his profession is therapeutic, he might invoke his own victimhood to convey empathy for those who suffered similarly.

Granted, Christianity(and modern Jewishness) perfected the art of combining self-pity with ruthless aggression: “Sanctified by our saintly suffering, we’re morally justified in beating the war drums and destroying our enemies.”
Because the media apparatus controls short-term active memory whereas the academia functions largely as storage of long-term dormant memory, the media exert far more influence on Current History, though, to be sure, given the sheer politicization of the academia, many ‘scholars’ are far less interested in the depth of knowledge than what’s most useful to fashionable agendas.

The Jewish-run media have a funny idea of the ‘enemy’. The supposed enemies of the US, more often than not, aren’t those countries that chose to be enemies but were designated as such on the basis of “Is it good for the Jews?” So, even though Russia has long wanted good relations with the US, it’s been an ‘enemy’ because it didn’t totally put out like a whore to World Jewry. And even though China doesn’t want to be an enemy, it’s hyped as such because Jews prefer Americans to fixate on Yellow Peril as a distraction from Jewish Domination of the West.
Even Iran, always placed at the top of the list as an enemy of the US, has sought working relations with the West. It too is a designated-enemy than an enemy-of-its-own-choosing.
Jewish Power is like a mad-bitch girlfriend who insists on deciding who her lover’s friends and enemies are. No matter how much someone wants to be his friend, he must reject him as an ‘enemy’ if the mad bitch whispers into his ears to do so.
As such, the US has ended up with so many unnecessary enemies, or enemies only because Jews have designated them as such. It means White America has no agency in deciding with whom it should be friends or enemies. Jews decide, whites follow. Notice how the US interfered in the Middle East in the name of fighting terrorists after 9/11 but now regards Syria as a ‘friendly country’ even though it’s ‘led’ by a Jihadist(though some say he’s a crypto-Jew).

History is vast, but Current History operates only in relation to active memory while 99% of historical memory remains dormant and buried. No wonder the Western Media got away with pushing the ‘unprovoked Russian invasion of Ukraine’ narrative. They keep buried all the histories of what had happened to Russia in the 1990s, how the West manipulated events in Ukraine with one Color Revolution after another, how the Kiev authority shelled civilians in Donbass, and etc.
Instead, the narrative activates the selective memories of autocratic Putin murdering dissidents and Russians barging into Ukraine. Same goes for the crisis surrounding Iran. Instead of a complex narrative, we get a cookie-cutter cartoon about tyrannical mullahs secretly cooking up a Bomb, presumably to blow up London and NY, along with Israel. Never mentioned are Israel’s support of terrorism(and its own founding through terrorist acts, not just against the Arabs but the British) and the dark story of its attaining the Bomb, as well as the fact it hasn’t been pressed upon to come clean on these matters.
At the deeper level, on matters of Jewish-and-Goy relations, for example, the active memory dwells on numerous instances of goy-on-Jewish hatred and/or violence while keeping in dormant storage all the details about Jewish contempt for goyim. The history of Jewish antipathy toward goyim is certainly shelved in the stacks but not placed on the lectern.

At any rate, things are even worse because so much of Current History operates not only on the basis of selective memory but distorted or even outright false memory. In other words, even the paths-not-taken are invoked as if they were. Iran long ago decided not to build the Bomb, which means it took the non-Bomb path when faced with several alternatives. But, the West speaks of Iran as if it took the path of the Bomb. Iran doesn’t have the Bomb, but the West prefers the What-If-Iran-Got-The-Bomb narrative as holy writ. Suppose you had the choice of stealing some expensive jewelry but chose not to, but people still speak of you as if you did.
Current History is often molded from Let’s-Pretend-History, i.e. let’s just pretend something happened even if it didn’t and go with that. Some idiot is likely to raise the question, “WHAT IF Iran had negotiated on the nuclear issue. Then, Israel and the US would not have attacked.” Yes, an interesting what-if, except that Iran was indeed negotiating with the US(as spokesman for Israel) but got attacked anyway by the collusion of Israel and the US deep state.

One of the big What-If’s of History concerns what might have been if Adolf Hitler and National Socialism hadn’t been Anti-Jewish or Anti-Semitic. What if it had been more like Italian Fascism, at least prior to its drastic revision on the Jewish Question following the alliance with Germany. (Incidentally, National Socialist Germany probably would have weathered the storm had it not been so anti-Russo-Slavic, a more important what-if.)

But then, how would one define Anti-Jewishness in this context? Even if one isn’t anti-Jewish but is opposed to the agendas favored by Jews, one could be perceived by Jews as the enemy. Take all those Christian Zionist zealots who fetishize Jews and allow themselves to be exploited by the Tribe. Do Jews merely find them useful(but distasteful regardless) or truly regard them as a friendly people? Even as Jews accept the support of the Evangelicals, they do everything to push policies that demean and degrade Christian power in the US.

The politics of Liking-the-Jews is fraught with dangers because of the tribalist-supremacist-exclusionary attitudes of Judaism and Jewishness. Besides, many Jews are merely ethnically Jewish and define their truer identity in association with ideology; therefore, if you have no problem with Jewishness per se but disagree with Jewish-favored agendas, you could still be construed as ‘anti-Jewish’, e.g. “If you’re anti-cosmopolitan, then you could be anti-Jewish because Jews take pride in their supposedly rootless cosmopolitanism.”

The politics of Liking-Jews is like the politics of Liking-Nazis. Even if Russians expressed affection for Nazi Germans, the latter’s ideology was invested in enslaving/exterminating the Russians. Palestinians found out the hard way with the way of the Jews. Many Palestinians were favorably disposed to the Jews and didn’t object to Jewish immigration in the early years of Modern Palestine; many Palestinians even welcomed Jewish arrivals, but Zionism was predicated on, by hook and by crook, taking over the land and displacing the Palestinians. It had a mini-me Lebensraum Plan. (And how did it turn out for the American Indians who took a liking to the Pilgrims and fed them a turkey dinner?)

Because of the very nature of Talmudic Judaism, which is ethno-spiritually contemptuous of lowly goyim, and the very nature of Jewishness, which is monomaniacal in its ideological worldviews — “We Neocons are right about everything and must have everything our way, and that’s that” — , Liking-Jews is hardly enough to satisfy the Jews. Imagine you telling Bob, “You know, Bob, I think you’re a swell guy, and I like you”, but that’s not enough for Bob to like you back; you must agree with everything he says, must believe whatever he believes, and must do as he tells you, even if doing so may cause harm to yourself and your loved ones.

Given the nature of National Socialism, its hypothetical Philo-Semitism might still have been regarded as ‘Anti-Semitic’ or Anti-Jewish to many Jews. Even if National Socialism had excised the racial aspect of its ‘antisemitism’, it still would have found itself in opposition to much of Jewish power, influence, and proclivities. Suppose National Socialism welcomed and embraced those Jews who were willing to be Good Germans and patriots. Thus, it wouldn’t have been opposed to Jews as a race, i.e. as long as Jews were willing to make common cause with the Germans, they could be good comrades. Now, certain German Jews would surely have taken the bargain, either out of genuine admiration for National Socialism or mere opportunism. But would this have spared National Socialist Germany from the accusation of being anti-Jewish or Anti-Semitic from the perspective of World Jewry?
Christianity, after all, isn’t an racial credo, therefore not opposed to Jews on the basis of blood. If Jews convert to Christianity and become good Christians, they’re welcome as brothers and sisters. But has the lack of racial antisemitism in Christianity lessened the general Jewish hostility toward and contempt for Christianity?

National Socialism, even had it been accepting of Jews, would still have pressed upon them to favor German-ness over Jewishness as the primary object of loyalty. World Jewry might have had an issue with such a demand.
Indeed, during the Cold War, what was the main beef that Jews had with the Soviet Union? In the communist empire, Jews could work in any profession. They were accepted as good comrades. They weren’t discriminated against on the basis of Jewish identity. The problem arose ONLY IF Jews favored Jewish-Tribal or Jewish-Global interests over their loyalty to the Soviet Union.
Thus, even though the Soviet Union provided the Jews with the same rights that all other groups were entitled to, no more but no less, this pissed off many Jews around the world and turned them against the USSR.
In contrast, the Jews came to favor the US because it allowed for and then even celebrated Jewish Exceptionalism, which eventually turned into full-blown Jewish Supremacism that now forces all the West to revolve around Jewish megalomania. Such being the way of Jewishness, could Jews have come to terms with a National Socialist Germany that accepted Jews on the basis of their primary loyalty being to Germany? Probably not.

For Jews, getting ‘something’(which is what most people can hope for) isn’t enough. They must have EVERYTHING. Given the nature of National Socialism, it could offer Jews ‘something’ but not everything. Also, Jews had to agree to the terms of German patriotism, i.e Jewishness would have to be subsumed into the German national polity. Also, Jews would have to renounce parasitism, gangsterism, radicalism, and degeneracy they’d become so closely associated with during the Weimar Era, which most Germans regarded as Hell but which many Jews regarded as Heaven, much like Russia in the 1990s, a time when the bottom fell off for most Russians while sky was the limit for the Jews. Could World Jewry have accepted such terms?

At any rate, let’s assume that some kind of amity could have been reached between the National Socialist Germans and World Jewry. This Germany wouldn’t have been racially anti-Jewish and would have accepted Jews as fellow patriots(if willing to submit to the ideology of National Socialism), but it still would have been at odds with many attitudes and agendas pervasive among Jews at the time.
Still, as this Germany wouldn’t have been hostile to Jewishness per se, World Jewry might have chosen to do business with it.
Besides, we must keep in mind that this was before World War II and the Holocaust that would later elevate Jews to holy status. Back in the 1930s, even so-called Liberal Democracies had prominent figures in arts and politics who openly discussed the baleful influence of certain Jewish elements. By today’s standards of utterly deranged Philo-Semitism, even the US of the interwar period was ‘rabidly and virulently Anti-Semitic’, e.g. there was no shame in WASP clubs explicitly excluding Jews from membership and there were plenty of Christians preaching, “Yes, the Jews did kill Christ.”

With World Jewry tempering or withholding its hostility against Germany in the West, there might have been less resistance to Hitler’s territorial ambitions with neighboring nations. Also, had war broken out between Germany and the Soviet Union, the West might have either sided with Germany(against the ‘Asiatic’ commie hordes) or, at the very least, remained neutral, all the while doing business with Germany and supplying it with necessary material. Not that this would have ensured German victory over the USSR, but the Germans would have better shot at winning.

What bogged the Germans down in World War II was the repeat of the two-front war, though, to be sure, it was by their own design as the Germans had attacked the USSR first, whereby the most interesting What-If question is, “What if Germany had kept the peace with the USSR?”, notwithstanding alternative theories that Stalin had his own plans to advance westward.
Even though Germany became embroiled in war with the West(Britain and France) before with the East(Soviet Union), Hitler’s grand vision entailed an eventual clash with the East(while hoping for peace with the West).
Jewish influence played a significant part in swaying the British elites toward conflict with Germany. The influence was either direct(via monetary control over politicians) or indirect(via manipulation of paranoia about Germany as a threat to its British hegemony).
Jewish indirect influence also came by way of control of fashionable ideology, i.e. even those goy elites and elite-aspirants, who hardly thought about Jewish matters, fell under the spell of Jewish-biased intellectual norms that came to favor the Left over the Right. Thus, even though the New Deal actually had more in common with National Socialism as an economic policy, many Progressive types either idealized the Soviet system or were less antagonistic to it than to National Socialism, which was seen as a monstrosity.

At any rate, Jewish influence in the UK and US might not have been so unrelentingly anti-German had Hitler’s Germany not been so virulently anti-Jewish. Still, World Jewry might have been nearly as hostile to this hypothetical Germany simply because its economic program and political agenda(even if not anti-Jewish) stood in the way of finance-capitalism of the Western Jews and Marxism-Leninism of the Eastern Jews. (After all, the CIA toppled many governments even if they weren’t anti-American or anti-capitalist simply because their economic policies conflicted with US corporate interests.)
One thing for sure, had Hitler’s Germany been on better terms with the West, Stalin would have been far more vigilant about the German threat, thereby preventing the heavy losses suffered by the USSR in Operation Barbarossa.

One oft-heard argument is that Germany’s antisemitism lost out big in one crucial area: Science, so crucial to military technology. As some of the brightest minds in the German territories were Jews, their exile greatly benefitted the US(that soon became an enemy of Germany) and their persecution(or even elimination) denied German science of key talent. This argument is made especially in relation to the development of the atomic bomb, in the making of which Jewish scientists in the US played a significant role.

But, this argument isn’t quite convincing given the chronology of events. The US was untouched by war and had more manpower, wealth, and resources than the other great powers. Thus, it could invest more heavily into the atomic program than its peer competitors could. But even with all the effort and expenditure, the US produced the Bomb only in 1945 and after Germany’s defeat.
If the US, with all its advantages, just barely produced the Bomb in the last year of the conflict, it’s hardly likely that Germany, with more limited funds and resources, could have done any better even if it had kept its Jewish scientists.
Most likely, no such weapon could have been produced in time to use against the Soviets who would have rolled into Berlin by then. If Mainland USA, which was untouched by war, took so long to build the Bomb, what was the chance that Germany, already at war and expending the bulk of its resources against the Soviets, could have done any better even with the aid of Jewish scientists?

Video Link

But for the sake of argument, let’s suppose Jewish scientists in Germany had the magic touch and could have procured the Bomb for Hitler much earlier, say in 1942 or 1943(when the tide decisively turned in favor of the Soviets). Equipped with the Bomb, the Germans could now blow up entire divisions of the Soviet army and then blow up Soviet cities up too. And so, Germany wins, in which case Hitler’s gamble of being-nice-to-Jews would have paid off.
But, what would this have done to Jewish moral reputation? Jews would have played a key role in supplying madman Hitler with the ultimate weapon to conquer and destroy an entire civilization. Jews would have to share in the Nazi Guilt with the Germans in the horrifying campaign of enslavement and extermination in the East. It’d be like a much grander version of the current Judeo-Nazi alliance in Ukraine.

The biggest sigh of relief of World War II was that Russia somehow survived and prevailed over its ‘existential’ enemy. Sure, communism sucked and Stalin was a monster, but Hitler didn’t invade to liberate the Eastern Slavs(and other ethnic groups) from communism but to enslave them under Nazism. If Jews had made the Bomb for Hitler, the greatest Jewish minds would have been complicit in one of the greatest crimes in history.
Had they been offered an equal partnership in the conquest and carving up of Russia, would German Jews(and/or World Jewry) have taken the bait, especially if Hitler promised to enslave/exterminate the Russo-Slavs but spare the Jewish Bolsheviks? If so, it seems Hitler’s antisemitism did Jews a favor for preventing their participation in one of history’s ghastliest ventures.

Video Link

Whether the hypothetical Jewish-German alliance would have been viable or not, there’s plenty of evidence to the contrary that Being-Nice-to-Jews is any guarantee of Jewish reciprocity.
One conundrum is that Jewish Power is almost never satisfied with ‘enough’ and wants everything. If ‘enough’ is offered, it’s seen as an insult to Jewish pride(of mono/megalomania). But then, giving the Jews everything they want is no guarantee either because Jews will look upon anyone or any people who’d do that as a bunch of suckers and retards, so dumb as to deserve being robbed of everything. Anyway one looks at it, it’s a lose-lose situation as long as the Jews are in megalomaniacal and supremacist mode, which is ingrained in the guts-and-minds of many Jews. Give them ‘enough’, and Jews want ‘everything’. Give them ‘everything’, and Jews lose all respect for the dummies who fell for the swindle. Does Paulie have any respect for the restaurant owner: “F*** you, Pay me.”

Video Link

Let’s consider some examples of Liking-Jews didn’t pay off in Jews-Liking-Back. The Arabs in Palestine were initially welcoming of Jewish settlers. Some even welcomed Jewish immigrants into their homes. Given this reality, did the Zionists settle for some kind of mutual understanding between the two groups? No, the furtive plan of the Jews, even when they were on friendly terms with the Arabs, was always to create the conditions whereby the Jews would collectively ambush the Palestinians and drive them from their lands. Zionists speak of how they had no choice but to fight off the hostile Arabs, but the fact remains that the early Jewish settlers in Palestine were mostly met with friendly or indifferent Arabs. The violence resulted from the gradual realization among the Arabs that the Jews not-so-secretly meant to displace them and grab the entirety of the Holy Land for the Jews(mostly of European descent).

If Jews really want something, they can’t settle for a compromise and must have it all. The so-called Two-State Solution, for example, was just smoke-and-mirrors to create the illusion of compromise while the Jewish State always planned to use tyranny and terror to drive out the Palestinians and annex the territories into Greater Israel. And every success whets Jewish Supremacist appetite for more and more. Notice what the Greater Israel project has done to Iraq, Libya, and Syria, now a carcass for Israel and its ally Turkey to tear apart and devour. And recently, Jews even made a move on Iran. All these years, Iran tried to meet the Jewish-controlled West halfway with promises not to build nuclear weapons, but there was no reciprocity from the Jewish side(that has many nukes aimed at Iran).

Next, consider the example of wartime Japan. Despite it being part of the Axis, Japan didn’t coordinate with Germany on a single battle. Their wars unfolded in separate spheres, which means that the Japanese, for all their horrible crimes, committed no atrocities against the Jews. Furthermore, Japan refused to abide by Germany’s racial ideology and policies regarding the Jews and, as such, contributed nothing to the Holocaust. If anything, key Japanese figures even provided protection for certain Jewish communities in Asia.
But, did any of this matter to Jewish-Americans with their outsized contribution to the making of the Bomb? Did Jews try to persuade the powers-that-be to spare Japan from being nuked, especially as Germany had already surrendered and Japan teetered on total defeat? No, Jews were happy to see the nukes dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It’s all the more disturbing considering that the US plan was to drop 10 or 12 more nukes if Japan didn’t surrender. It seems Jews would have been okay with that too.
So, if the Japanese hoped that Being-Nice to Jews during the war would have earned them some favors from the Jews, they were sorely mistaken. Jews were awfully proud of their Bomb and happy to have them vaporize the ‘Japs’ to demonstrate their genius and prowess.

Now, consider Iran with its long-existing Jewish community. It’s been well-documented that the Jews Iran are tolerated and well-treated. Whether under the Shah or the Ayatollah, the Jewish community has been left alone to practice its religion and do business. Indeed, the Islamic Republic of Iran has long maintained that their problem isn’t with Judaism but with Zionism as an imperialist and supremacist ideology. Iran has no problem with Jews living in the Holy Land. The problem is with Jewish Supremacist Zionists treating the Palestinians, Muslims and Christians alike, as inferior beings to knock around.
Even many Jews who are obsessed with anti-Iran feelings acknowledge that the Jewish community in Iran has long thrived there. There are no pogroms in Iran, let alone anything like a Holocaust.

Even through all these years when World Jewry effectively declared war on Iran, Iranian authorities refused to go the Nazi-like path and target the Jewish community for special punishment(or revenge against global Jewish Power). In other words, it avoided the moral mistakes of the Germans who committed acts like Kristallnacht.
But has global Jewish animus toward Iran been any less intense than the Jewish hatred for National Socialist Germany? No, Global Jewish Power has done just about anything to destroy Iran and reduce it to another anal-rape victim of Zion. Iran’s well-treatment of its Jewish population has meant absolutely NOTHING to its Zionist tormentors who’re hellbent on making Iran succumb under pressure to all the Jewish demands and then some.
Iranians can go out of their way to show that they are not Anti-Semitic(or Anti-Jewish), only Anti-Zionist(or Anti-Jewish-Supremacist), till the cows come home, but they’ll get no relief from the endless barrage of hatred, literal or rhetorical, from World Jewry that is now represented by the likes of Benjamin Netanyahu.
The Islamic Republic of Iran has been nothing like National Socialist Germany on the Jewish Question but has been just as reviled and targeted for destruction by the Empire of Judea.

Now, let’s consider post-communist Russia. In the 1990s, Jews got hold of that vast country through their puppet-whore Boris Yeltsin and looted just about everything they could get their hands on. Russian Jews, European Jews, Israeli Jews, and American Jews all coordinated their efforts to carve the flesh off the bones of Russia. It was like watching a school of piranhas going at a helpless mammal in the river. It was like watching jackals and seagulls devour the flesh of a beached whale. What Jews did to Russia in the 1990s may well go beyond what Jews did to Germany during the Weimar Era.

Given this reality, the post-Yeltsin government in Russia could have taken a hard line against the Jews. But Putin didn’t. Even though he reined in the worst of the Jewish oligarchs, many Jewish oligarchs were allowed to keep their vast wealth(though ill-gotten) and privileges. Also, Putin made a special effort to protect the Jewish community in Russia, not least by enforcing laws that forbade ‘antisemitism’. Indeed, even ‘liberal’ Jews in Russia, for all their anti-Putin hatred, admitted that Jews in Russia were left alone to do whatever and pursue any endeavor(unless it was spreading globo-homo propaganda to the young ones or desecrating churches with ‘Pussy Riot’ antics).

Given such pro-Jewish measures on the part of Putin’s government, one would think most Jews around the world would have made peace with Russia. Many of the richest people in Russia are Jews. Jews are protected and lead affluent lives and have many opportunities. Putin’s government denounces ‘antisemitism’ and goes hard against anyone who dares to threaten or attack Jews. This Being-Nice-to-Jews approach is especially remarkable given that many of the most ruthless Bolsheviks were Jews(who went about attacking Russia’s Christian heritage) and many of the greediest gangster-capitalists were Jews(whose supposed ‘shock therapy’ stripped the Russian economy of its assets). To this day, Jews go on and on about how the Nazis confiscated Jewish property, but in fact, Jews stole a lot more from the Russian nation.

Even so, Russia hoped for a compromise and reciprocity between itself and World Jewry. Alexander Solzhenitsyn even wrote a book about Russians and Jews, whereby he called upon both groups to admit to their past wrongs and arrive at mutual understanding. But no matter what the Russian government has done for the Jews in Russia, Israel, and elsewhere, there’s been zero reciprocity from the Jewish Side. As far as most Jews are concerned, the blame was always and entirely with the Russians, whereas the Jews were totally blameless. So, it doesn’t matter if Putin and Russia want to make amends and meet the Jews halfway. No, it must be the Jewish Way all the way, and Russia better just bow down and do as told.

Consider two more examples.

Apartheid South Africa was the closest ally of Israel. Jews in South Africa were fabulously rich and had the full support of the white government. When much of the Third World ostracized Israel during the Cold War, South Africa remained a staunch supporter.
So, how did World Jewry treat South Africa? It used media power to dump on the country as the worst tyranny in the world, a Neo-Nazi colonial state in Africa, while providing moral cover for Israel, the human rights abuses of which went far beyond anything in South Africa. As Desmond Tutu said, what blacks experienced in South Africa under white rule was a picnic compared to what the Palestinians experienced on a daily basis.
And then, consider the American South where Jews had been welcomed to prosper in finance and trade, and indeed many Jews found more opportunities there than in the North where the Eastern Establishment had a lock on most elite fields. But during the Civil Rights Era, American Jews of all stripes coordinated efforts to dump on White Southerners as a bunch of subhuman redneck thugs who casually lynched angelic blacks always falsely accused of rape.
Even today, Neo-Confederate types in the South are among the biggest supporters of Zionism when, ironically, virtually all Jews across the entire political spectrum join with blacks to shame every last vestige of White Southern heritage.
So much for Jewish Reciprocity.

Now, let’s consider the fate of nations and peoples who have totally submitted to all the Jewish demands. Jews make a big deal of Winston Churchill, the British Lion who stood up to the Evil Nazis. Unlike most Europeans who either allied with, surrendered to, or collaborated with the Nazis, the British people refused to appease evil and fought for freedom, or so says the Good War Narrative.

Given this factoid of 20th century British History, one would think that Jewish Power would have done everything to preserve and protect what made Great Britain a special civilization. Indeed, it’s hard to think of a people more cucked to Jewish Power than the British Anglos who support the Jews/Zionists in all their endeavors, like the Ukraine War(or more like the Judeo-Russian War), the recent destruction of Syria, the endless massacres of the Palestinians, and the plan to destroy Iran.

Yet, Jewish Power has done everything to insult, mock, and humiliate the White Britons. Over the years, Jewish Power did everything to push White Nakba or the Great Replacement on Britain. Jews run BBC and cast blacks in historical British/European roles. Even as British Anglos go out of their way to protect Jewish identity, culture, and feelings, British Jews return the favor by degrading and despoiling Historic Britain. Anglos decry as ‘Anti-Semitic’ anything that might offend Jewish sensibilities while Jews exult in Anti-White hatred and Anti-Anglo insults. British Anglos pledge to defend Israel as a Jewish State while Jews in Britain are hell-bent on pushing the agenda of the Afro-Colonization-of-White-Wombs. Negrolatry and GloboHomo, both heavily funded by World Jewry, have become the new cult religions of the Anglos who’ve totally cucked their bodies and souls to the Jews.

What does that tell us? National Socialist Germans were anti-Jewish, and we can understand why the Jews were anti-German. But Iran and Russia aren’t Anti-Jewish, but Jews foam at the mouths with anti-Iranian and anti-Russian hatred. As for the British Anglos, they’ve totally submitted to Jewish Power, but the Jews still go about eviscerating the heart and soul of Historic Britain. It’s like DAMNED IF YOU DO, DAMNED IF YOU DON’T. Jews say that the US didn’t do enough during World War II to stop the Holocaust. Now, Jews complain that the US isn’t doing enough to facilitate the genocide in Gaza.

Video Link

Video Link

And of course, look at the U.S., perhaps the only country in the world that is more cucked to Jewish Power than the U.K. is. American Politics is a pissing contest of who can suck more semen from Netanyahu’s cock.
Jews have repeatedly said that, after all their troubles in the Old World, they found something like paradise in the U.S. There were no pogroms like in the Pale of Settlement. No forced conversions like in Spain. And of course, nothing like the Holocaust. Given the levels of Jewish success in the U.S.(that was envisioned and built mostly by Anglo-Americans and other white Americans), one would think Jews would have shown gratitude and done everything to maintain the very America that allowed for Jewish freedoms and success.

But, what has Jewish influence wrought on the US? Jews, who still bitch about the Kristallnacht, funded and encouraged mob violence that created a thousand Kristallnachts in 2020 in wake of George Floyd’s death from drug overdose. And given that white cops made ‘blue’ Democratic-dominated cities livable again after the crime epidemic of the Sixties and the Seventies, you’d think these mostly Democratic Jews would lend moral support to the police. Instead, the Jews threw the cops to the wolves of BLM, Antifa, and other ‘woke’ morons just for political expediency: “Hey blacks, Trump’s America is ‘racist’ and killing innocent black men, so go and vote Democratic!”

Via support of mass immigration, Jewish-Americans replaced whites with nonwhites. Via promotion of degenerate GloboHomo as an official cult, Jewish-Americans have replaced Christianity(and natural norms) with Queertianity(and the ‘new normal’). Via sacralization of the Negro, Jewish-Americans have justified endless black-on-white violence, with whites always being the ones to blame. Via Zionist lunacy, Jewish-Americans have gotten the US embroiled in more pointless wars that ended up killing millions and derailing global peace that might have been with the end of the Cold War.

So, what conclusion are we to draw from these manifestations of Jewish Power? Nazi Germany hated the Jews, Russian and Iran sought understanding with the Jews, and the US/UK totally cucked to the Jews. But, Jews have targeted all of them for destruction. A rational person would say the real problem is primarily with the Jews themselves. It reminds me of the Jewish joke about the chimney. No answer can satisfy the question.

https://kolaleph.org/2013/01/16/the-rabbi-is-in-two-men-come-down-the-same-chimney/

Putin sucking up to Netanyahu. Some good it for Russia in lessening Jewish Supremacist hostility.