The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Alan Macleod Archive
Blinken Ordered the Hit. Big Tech Carried It Out. African Stream Is Dead
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
List of Bookmarks

On Tuesday, July 1, 2025, African Stream published its final video, a defiant farewell message. With that, the once-thriving pan-African media outlet confirmed it was shutting down for good. Not because it broke the law. Not because it spread disinformation or incited violence. But because it told the wrong story, one that challenged U.S. power in Africa and resonated too deeply with Black audiences around the world. When Secretary of State Antony Blinken accused it of being a Kremlin front, Big Tech didn’t hesitate, and within hours, the platform was erased from nearly every major social media site.

In September, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken made the call and announced an all-out war against the organization, claiming, without evidence, that it was a Russian front group. “Russian state-funded media outlet RT secretly runs the online platform, African Stream, across a wide range of social media platforms,” he said, adding:

According to the outlet’s website, ‘African Stream is’ – and I quote ‘a pan-African digital media organization based exclusively on social media platforms, focused on giving a voice to all Africans, both at home and abroad.’ In reality, the only voice it gives is to Kremlin propagandists.”

Within hours, big social media platforms jumped into action. Google, YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok all deleted African Stream’s accounts, while Twitter demonetized the organization.

African Stream attempted to continue, but it finally ceased operations this week. MintPress News spoke with the company’s founder and CEO, Ahmed Kaballo, who told us that, with just one statement, Washington was able to destroy their entire operation, stating:

We are shutting down because the business has become untenable. After we got attacked by Antony Blinken, we really tried to continue, but without a platform on YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, and being demonetized on X, it just meant the ability to generate income became damn near impossible.”

The news has disappointed the Nairobi, Kenya-based outlet’s large and rapidly growing follower base. At the time of the coordinated operation against it, the account boasted almost one million followers on TikTok, almost 880,000 on Instagram, and almost half a million on YouTube, reaching 30-40 million people per month. Growing from nothing in 2022, it expanded rapidly, offering a pan-African perspective on global events, and worked to expose the role of imperialism on the continent.

African Stream cultivated a large and committed audience among African Americans, with celebrities, rappers, and NBA basketball stars regularly sharing their content. It was this combination of anti-imperialist messaging and influence with Black America that Kaballo believes triggered the State Department smears, explaining that:

We criticized the Republicans and the Democrats. We followed the pan-African tradition of Malcolm X, who said that there is no difference between the fox and the wolf, you get bitten either way. And because we had so much influence on the Black community in the U.S., we were seen to be a threat to the Democratic Party. That’s why we feel like it was a partisan attack.”

Blinken’s attack was not the first African Stream had received. Last June, NBC News claimed (without providing examples) that African Stream sought to undermine the 2024 elections by spreading disinformation. Then, in August, U.S. government-funded media outlet Voice of America wrote that Kaballo’s organization “distorts the U.S. military’s mission in Somalia,” insisting that the U.S. is bombing one of the continent’s poorest countries to “protect civilians.” Leaked documents also show that the British Foreign Office plotted to run a smear campaign against them.

Kaballo told MintPress that he expected the attacks. “It’s no real surprise,” he said. “The surprise was that big tech, with no evidence whatsoever, decided to take us down.”

However, given the extremely close ties between Silicon Valley and the U.S. national security state – something that MintPress has consistently reported on – Kaballo should perhaps have been more prepared for this outcome.

Google’s Director of Security and Public Trust, Ben Randa, for example, was formerly NATO’s Strategic Planning and Information Officer. Meanwhile, Facebook’s Senior Misinformation Policy Manager, Aaron Berman, the individual most responsible for determining the platform’s political direction, is a former high-ranking CIA agent. Like other platforms, TikTok has also hired dozens of former officials from the FBI, CIA, and State Department to oversee its most sensitive internal affairs.

If Blinken genuinely wanted to unearth a government-sponsored influence operation, he would not have to look far. Earlier this year, a funding freeze at the U.S. government agency USAID exposed a global network of supposedly “independent” media outlets that Washington secretly bankrolled. The scale of this operation was vast: more than 6,200 journalists at nearly 1,000 organizations across five continents had their salaries secretly paid in whole or in part by the U.S. government.

While the outlooks of these media groups differed, they all shared one similarity: an unwavering commitment to promoting Washington’s interests.

The pause in funding was keenly felt in Ukraine. Oksana Romanyuk, the director of the country’s Institute for Mass Information, lamented that almost 90% of local media outlets were funded by USAID, including many with no other source of income.

In neighboring Belarus, a survey of 20 leading outlets found that 60% of their budgets came directly from Washington.

Following the freeze, anti-government Cuban media were plunged into an existential crisis. Miami-based CubaNet, for instance, published an editorial soliciting donations from its readers. “We are facing an unexpected challenge: the suspension of key funding that sustained part of our work,” they wrote; “If you value our work and believe in keeping the truth alive, we ask for your support.”

In 2024, CubaNet received around half a million dollars from USAID alone. U.S.-backed Iranian media, meanwhile, resorted to mass layoffs of their staff.

The African Stream story highlights the sorry state of global communications, where the United States has the power to choke, and even simply delete, media outlets that stand for an alternative vision of the world. Washington both funds thousands of journalists around the planet to produce pro-U.S. propaganda, and, through its close connections to Silicon Valley, has the power to destroy those that do not toe the line.

African Stream is far from the first independent, anti-imperialist news organization to have been targeted by Washington. MintPress itself has been repeatedly attacked and smeared as a secret Iranian, Chinese, Russian, Syrian, or even Venezuelan operation. Our reach on social media has been throttled, and we have been debanked by PayPal. Other leading alternative media outlets tell a similar story.

It is a similar story in Europe, where the region’s support for Israeli actions in Palestine has sparked a crackdown on independent journalism. British journalists Richard Medhurst and Asa Winstanley have had their homes raided by police, while the European Union has sanctioned Hüseyin Dogru for his coverage of pro-Palestine protests.

In what may prove to be their final post, on Tuesday, July 1, African Stream released a video of their staff dancing, accompanied by the words:

It’s tough to accept that we had to shut down over baseless accusations by the U.S. government. But instead of bowing out in silence, the team chose to resist, just as our ancestors often did, through dance. You can deplatform us. You can smear us. But you can’t stop us dancing.”

On the surface, the overt censorship of a Kenyan media outlet by the U.S. government may be a depressing story. Yet Kaballo remained upbeat about the situation, noting that the state of radical African media has drastically improved since 2022, with many channels taking up a pan-African, anti-imperialist message. “In the next few years, hopefully there will be 20 or 30 different versions of African Stream, hitting people with high-quality content,” he said.

(Republished from MintPress News by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 7 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Nelsz says:

    This is why Saint Tim Berners-Lee created the no pay to content providers internet. The (((money powers))) control everything. 5 to 10 cents a visit would have saved African Stream.

  2. Notsofast says:

    why are there no african nations willing to back them? especially now, with all the promising pan african governments coming together, driving the french and americans out of their former colonial possessions. this would seem a golden opportunity for them, to spread their story to a wider western audience, that africa stream had already reached.

    since the bbc can be funded entirely by the british government openly, why would african nations not have the same right. if funding isn’t an issue, they could still get the word out, allowing their content to be shared to a wider audience, without worrying about being deplatformed or defunded.

    • Replies: @Miro23
  3. @Dwayne

    And that in this black Preacher’s sermon being true means that blacks aint set behind these horrors we face. Blacks are just tools and qweaponsused by certain whited to wage cultural war against all the white they hate.

    And then we have all the damned white fools who bleat about a need for all whites to live by white identity. Is that white identity the one that is Anglo-Zionist or one of the many white identities that are hated by Anglo-Zionism?

    That is the dividing line, regardless of the race of the person taking a stand: are you for or against Anglo-Zionist Empire?

    The most sacred cow of this horror show we love in is not blacks, nor is it women nor gays nor trannies. Nor even is the most sacred cow Jews. The mist scared cow is Anglo-Zionist Empire, which to keep its current status would gladly oversee the deaths of all Jews who oppose it in any way it sees as important and also all whites who speak English and are Protestant.

    Anglo-Zionist Empire is as rapacious a monster as ever devised by men.

  4. Miro23 says:
    @Notsofast

    why are there no african nations willing to back them? especially now, with all the promising pan african governments coming together, driving the french and americans out of their former colonial possessions. this would seem a golden opportunity for them, to spread their story to a wider western audience, that africa stream had already reached.

    If the Chinese are paying attention. China has good productive relations with Africa. Financing Africa Stream wouldn’t cost much and give Africa Stream the chance to establish new platforms.

    • Agree: Franz, Notsofast
  5. Let’s say it’s a Russian-front group, which it isn’t.

    But who cares when everything in the US is a Zionist-Jewish-Israeli-front group.

    We want diversity of front groups.

  6. Why is it that Nick Fuentes and Stew Peters are still broadcasting, but these Africans could not do it?

    Do the Africans refuse to go to the Rumble, Bitchute, and Locals cyber ghettos because they are too “right wing?” Hey Africans – right wing just means you love your tribe or nation before the rest of the world! Isn’t that what you want? Or is it just for thee and not for me? Don’t buy into the Jewish Globalist propaganda – true nationalists support nationalists all over the world – IN THEIR OWN NATIONS.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Alan Macleod Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World