The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewAndrew Anglin Archive
I Hadn’t Seen This Ronald Reagan “Diversity Is Our Greatest Strength” Speech
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
List of Bookmarks

It doesn’t surprise me, but I hadn’t seen it. Ronald Reagan gave a speech about how diversity is our greatest strength and how anyone in the world can become an American.

Reagan is seen as the avatar of conservatism. Every single one of these people references Reagan. He was actually a horrible persona and a horrible president.

So I’m not surprised he did the “anyone can be an American” thing.

The requirement to become an American?

To believe in freedom.

Have you ever heard of a person who is “against freedom”?

Even in North Korea, Kim gives speeches about the importance of freedom.

Everyone on earth is pro-freedom, in the same way everyone on earth is pro-food.

If believing in freedom means you’re an American in waiting, then everyone on earth is already an American, they are just waiting to get their papers.

That means America is not actually a country. I don’t think it’s right to say it’s “an idea” either, because that doesn’t even make sense. It’s not an idea, it’s a place. Ideas are not physical objects in the way a mass of land is. But if everyone on earth has a right to become an American, and therefore de facto already is an American, there is no such thing as an American.

What they will try to say when you say a country can’t be an idea is that members of the nation hold a set of ideas and that’s what defines them as part of the same nation. It’s nothing to do with race. And it’s not ideas around religion. Or any kind of politics.

These same people will say “Americans can disagree with one another.”

You just have to believe in freedom, and you can define that freedom however you want.

I don’t know why Reagan was a saint to the boomers. I read a short book about him years ago, but it was written by a leftist. I know he deregulated everything and there were some good things about that along with all of the overwhelmingly negative things about that. Like, sometimes when I’m depressed, I watch 1980s cartoons, and before Reagan, most of these cartoons were illegal because they were advertisements for toys and advertising to kids was regulated.

I think mainly it was just an incredibly wealthy period in American history which happened to coincide with the collapse of communism. It was the beginning of the boomers lighting everything on fire and just burning it all down.

And the poison ideology that “everyone on earth is an American in waiting” is really at the core of boomerism. The boomers were a very selfish people, and they really liked goofy, saccharine feel-good gibberish like “America is the greatest country on earth.”

(Republished from The Daily Stormer by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: History, Ideology, Race/Ethnicity • Tags: Diversity, Ronald Reagan 
Hide 71 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. JPS says:

    Hey about the Reagan speech on anybody being an American, it was propaganda, a speech written for him. Remember that Reagan was an actor and a radio personality before he was a politician. Reagan was sort of a Midwestern homespun sort of fellow with an Irish father, but he was also a product of Hollywood. You know, the kind of guy who had his way with a teenage Liz Taylor.

    He did some dumb stuff in office in retrospect, but I think he didn’t recognized the long term consequences of the immigration stuff, or he was simply pushed and was too elderly to push back. Reagan is more of a Gen X “saint” than a Boomer saint. You have to have vivid memories of the Cold War to understand. Boomers were already burning everything down back in the 60s and 70s Andrew. That’s when their Reign of Terror started. It’s been Sixty years now of Boomer Terror, and Trump is still President. The fact that these people talk about another term for Trump is easy to put down as trolling, but I actually think Boomers may be insane, they don’t think they’re going to die anytime soon.


    Video Link

    • LOL: Emslander
  2. there was some de-classified reagan stuff after his death that included how him and nancy’s bedroom talk

    it sounded like the guy had a bigtime feces fetish

    • Troll: JPS
    • Replies: @Hulkamania
  3. Reagan came out of Hollywood. And in many ways he was a very naive small town midwesterner who assumed that all people are basically good and therefore very much alike. In addition to Reagan never grasping what was being done to the nation by the Anti-Racism crowd, he failed to get even a glimmer of the evils being done out of his administration by Neocons. And he had the gayest White House in history to that point – again, because Reagan was a naive fool in many ways and was from Hollywood.

    Reagan was a Pyrrhic victory. Very much like Pope John Paul II, the naive Pole who was easily used by Jews and Mohammedans and, especially, Anglo Protestants and Anglo-Zionist Empire.

    • Agree: mark green
  4. Leif says:

    “It doesn’t surprise me, but I hadn’t seen it. ”

    Hmm…does that mean you have never read/do not read any articles on the very informative and academic Institute For Historical Review website (which also publishes here on TUR just a few columns below yours)?

    If so (?) come on Andy, please read more:

    Just a few examples regarding the myth about Reagan:

    Audio:
    https://ihr.org/audio_file/mark-weber-june-12-2004

    https://ihr.org/audio/weekly-roundup

    Text:
    https://ihr.org/journal/v05p325_hattenhauer-html

  5. Anonymous[210] • Disclaimer says:

    Durr. Reagan was an actor. Like Zelensky, like Trump. All presidents are basically actors. The best ones have training. The worst ones don’t. Someone else pulls their strings and write their speeches.

    The 80s were good because they were basically the end of an era. The boomers had started burning things down in the 1960s, but some things take a long time to burn.

    By the 1990s, however, cracks were showing, and in the 2000s the fire spread everywhere.

    • Replies: @admin user
    , @JunkyardDog
  6. Rich says:

    Reagan signed Martin King day into law, appointed affirmative action Sandy O’Connor to the Supreme Court and helped bring the Bush family to power. Besides running up the debt and legalizing millions of illegals. He was a left of center republican. But probably better than Carter or Mondale who were his opponents and were insanely leftist and anti-White.

    • Replies: @Pythas
    , @Piglet
  7. Abhuman says:

    He was often credited with being smart but I don’t think that there was much real evidence of that. I think all of his books were co-written or ghost-written. I think that Forrest Gump was loosely based on him.

    I advise people to not take seriously any politician that produces co-written/ghost-written books and speeches. If a politician does this, it means that he’s only there to fawned over by adoring crowds. Anyway, I never regarded Reagan as a conservative hero. I thought he was undermining us from the inside, and I still think that.

    • Agree: 1951
  8. JPS says:

    If you’re old enough to remember Reagan, you’re old enough to remember that he was smeared as badly, if not worse, than Trump has been smeared. He was really loathed with a pathetic hatred, especially by Left-wing boomers. The hatred of Trump was most intense before he was elected and then immediately after the January 6th incident. Most of the time, the media, while they still don’t know how to respond to him breaking all the old rules that gentiles usually are required to follow, have not pushed too hard to defame him.

    Recall that Reagan won even Massachusetts in 1984, and it’s almost surely the case that Minnesota was stolen by the Democrats (the state Mondale was governor) there to prevent a 50 state blowout. Reagan was a kind of hero for defying the non-stop venom and spittle of the enraged shitlib brats who were accustomed to having everything their way since Watergate.

    To me, the Reagan Administration is like a western cowboy boot stomping on Doonesbury’s face forever.

    A glorious time to be alive.

    • Disagree: JudeoSatanism
  9. JPS says:

    You had to be a kid in the 80s. No internet. Just Dan Rather, Peter Jennings, and Tom Brokaw, with McLaughlin group on the weekends and the Sunday shows.

    https://imgur.com/ronbo-poster-against-ronald-reagan-united-states-1984-u5Q9zGI

    • Replies: @Sparkon
  10. JPS says:

    One more comment about Reagan.

    After he left office, as far as the media was concerned, it was as if he’d never existed, (except in reference to Iran-Contra and his alleged early Alzheimers). He died in 2004. The Alzheimers trope was the only thing to remember about Reagan, and the subsequent “historical” specials about him had the same tone, focusing continually on alleged dementia.

    People who loved Reagan may not have actually known all that much about what was really going on during his administration. Reagan himself was probably not “up to snuff” to be an effective President actually in control of everything going on. Nevetheless, people had fond memories, so when he died in 2004, there was widespread acknowledgement that his time as President was remembered fondly, whereas the comments of the leftist shitty brat boomers and kikes who relished every smear about him were something to forget – people for the historical rubbish bin, like their communist professors.

    Good or bad, Reagan symbolizes an era. He was a deeply flawed President, but he represented (whether or not he truly did so in fact) the old America’s continued rejection of the 60s Boomer Revolution.

    • Replies: @Understory
  11. HT says:

    The Jews got to Reagan at some point. Remember he gave us the MLK national holiday and amnesty for millions of illegals which destroyed California quickly. If Reagan is a conservative icon then I never want to be referred to as conservative.

  12. @Anonymous

    The boomers had started burning things down in the 1960s, but some things take a long time to burn.

    You’re confusing boomers with hippies and marxists.

    • Agree: SteveK9
  13. Many of you still do not understand how diversity is our greatest strength and the answer this 5th of July is quite simple! Allow me to explain; no there is too much, allow me to sum up.

    Monolithic countries, families, races etc are all naturally resistant to subversion and due to their serenity are able to notice when an alien parasite is attempting to infiltrate and colonize, so wat do? The answers are many, and historically proven, and one of the most effective is adding a multitude of different races to the culture, causing turbulence and chaos and sapping the collective strength of the targeted culture. It’s very simple, you see.

    As the culture is parasitized by various leech races that suck and slurp on those that are naturally more productive, it is weakened so the master race can then easily infiltrate. And as a White American Evangelical, I recognize my personal role in dismantling every facet of the west to serve my masters, the true children of God, and to be honest, the only race that is fully human and uncorrupted. Of course you realize I’m talking about our friends, the Jewish people.

    For instance, the rubes of Tennessee recently passed legislation making the renting of apartments to illegals a class E or A felony, with fines and prison terms of 6 or 60 years respectively. Now, diversity allows our masters to stir the melting pot, sow chaos, and dilute the hated whites with an endless tide of r-selected low-IQ breeders that hilariously enough whitey gets to pay for. It’s like all these browns and blacks we Evangelicals and Baptists import are a vast multitude of cowbirds, making cuckolds of hapless, gutless, clueless whites.

    A coalition led by the Tennessee-based Southeastern Synod of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America filed the lawsuit on June 20, joined by a Nashville landlord and a Mexican immigrant in the state.

    Look, we don’t hate fellow whites per se, we just want to go to Jew heaven as we know life here on Earth is merely a blip in our existence; the jews put their faith in wealth, security, iron racial and familial bonds, large families, nepotism, racial apartheid in Israel, liquidation of individuals that oppose them, usury and on and on, and really who cares? As God’s chosen, as revealed in a series of disjointed pamphlets written by other Jews, they can do as they want.

    Now for you friend the only chance you have for live eternally is to submit to and to serve jews and Israel. If you bless Israel, then you get blessed, at a one-to-one ratio! Then, see, after you die you go to Jew heaven where you get to have all your wishes fulfilled as long as your wishes are to sing endless praises to a jew, or something. My theological education was surprisingly bereft of just what goes on in Jew Heaven, but I’m sure it not only exists, I’m sure it’s way cool!

    For Jews so love the world they practice Tinkum Oleo which means they have a given directive, a divine directive to heal our world, and if whites and their evil are a blight (protip: we are!) then healing the world of them is our duty. It’s all in the Bible, written by Jews, and if jews are known for one thing and one thing alone, it’s being totally straight shooters when dealing with the goyim as they affectionally call us.

    Never forget friends, we Evangelicals walk among you daily, we work beside you perhaps, but ultimately our eyes are watching God, just like Zora Neale Hurston was! And we will do our best to annihilate this Nation, your children, your race in our totally not lunatic low-iq mindless obsequious service to jews and the mind-virus of Judeo-Christianity – no, only we know the Truth and we get to ascend to the waters above called Heaven by climbing a mountain of the burned carcasses of those killed by US 2000 lb bombs in Palatine, and your children slaughtered by illegals and feral imported Somalis.

    Many of you might consider us the foulest type of demonic traitors that have literally ever existed in the entire history of creation, indeed of any multi-verse or timeline that exists, or could exist but that’s not reality. The reality is, we recognize Jew heaven is what matters, and the Jew written books tell us how to get there – by serving, submitting to, and doing whatever we are commanded to do.

    So get on down to your nearest Evangelical church tomorrow and get in on the winning team, and come along for the big win! You cannot become a Jew but you can do the next best thing, become a saved Evangelical! Tell them the Fat White Boomer sent you, they’ll know who I am!

  14. @JPS

    Broke the air traffic controllers union, amnesty for 30 million criminals, ramped spending, lit a rocket under the wealth gap, deregulated the banks even more, focused on da Evil Empire instead of domestic issues…

    Reagan was an actor, like they all are. Just a dumb horse his betters could ride, and guide, in the direction they wanted. Watched the cinematic paean to him last year, was a decent film but he wasn’t any lion of conservatism. And his actions had exceptionally bad consequences, a snowball rolling downslope, if you will.

    • Replies: @JPS
  15. JPS says:

    I once was acquainted with an ex-con, the brother of a former friend.

    He had been, imprisoned, held in contempt for years because he refused to submit a handwriting sample.

    He was suspected of burning down a high school concession stand upon which he supposedly wrote:

    666 REAGAN IS THE ANTICHRIST

    We don’t have to pretend Reagan was somebody he was not, but we don’t have to have to vent spleen on Reagan (retroactive derangement) after he’s been dead for over twenty years.

    Incidentally, I was surprised to see that ex-cons’ adage about the bicentennial: American Independence, Two Hundred Years and Still Waiting has become “mainstream.”

  16. JPS says:
    @A_Hand_Hidden

    amnesty for 30 million criminals

    You’re off by a factor of ten. The scale of replacement migration has increased very fast as the Jews fear future interruption. I suspect Reagan had the naive impression that the country was still mostly white (as it seemed to be in most places in the 1980s) it just had a few colorful minorities in places as it has often had in the past. In particular, the Cold War rhetoric emphasized that people wanted to come to the USA and leave the Eastern Bloc, Red China, North Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, etc.

    We’ll see what Trump does on the issue. He doesn’t have to run again. Only Congress is Republican, Reagan never had a Republican House, only had the Senate once. Not sure why the Air Traffic Controllers going on strike is supposed to be something that needs to be tolerated by a Republican President.

    The amazing thing about Reagan is how much he was hated. The hatred of Reagan might be greater than the hatred of Trump. The pro-Soviet American Communists were still out in force in the 1980s. One thing is for sure, there was nothing to counter-balance the Jew media in the early to mid 80s. It was all mockery of Reagan, all the time, and I notice it stuck with a lot of boomers.

    The Sandra Day O’Connor and Anthony Kennedy picks were disastrous, at least he did try to put Robert Bork on there.

    The worst thing Reagan did was bomb Libya and attack the Iranian Navy. By 1988 Reagan was probably not making too many free decisions anymore, being surrounded by Bush’s lackies.

    • Replies: @A_Hand_Hidden
  17. charles44 says:
    @HT

    Reagan’s own political rise had been orchestrated by Hollywood mogul Lew Wasserman of MCA, yet another Chicago transplant. Wasserman together with his mentor Jules Stein also had decades of mob-ties stretching back to Al Capone himself, having regularly employed gangster muscle to strong-arm their business partners and suppress their competitors.

    Russo provides the remarkable account of how Wasserman had propelled Reagan, then a washed-up B movie actor, into the presidency of the Screen Actors Guild in 1959 in order to obtain a special industry exemption for MCA, afterward rewarding the future president with an extremely lucrative TV contract. As a result of this successful regulatory maneuver, MCA’s unique business opportunities established Wasserman as the reigning king of Hollywood for decades and he subsequently played a major role in elevating Reagan to the governorship.

    Russo’s own factual account of these events draws upon Dark Victory: Ronald Reagan, MCA, and the Mob, a heavily-researched 1986 volume by veteran crime journalist Dan Moldea, which I had previously read and found quite persuasive. The enormous clout of MCA and its executives seem to have severely reduced distribution and media coverage of Moldea’s book, while the author was forced to resign from The Institute of Policy Studies, a leftwing DC thinktank dependent upon financing from MCA-connected donors. A very similar fate had previously befallen popular author Henry Denker’s 1972 novel The Kingmaker, a roman a clef portraying Wasserman and the political rise of Reagan, which also saw its distribution widely suppressed despite its excellent reviews.

    From American Pravda: The Power of Organized Crime by Ron Unz, July 15, 2019.

  18. @JPS

    … the Reagan Administration is like a western cowboy boot stomping on Doonesbury’s face forever.

    A comment this smart and this witty turns up hereabouts so bloody seldom that it deserves to be highlighted when it interrupts the typical thread’s flood of mindless attaboys, adolescent ramblings, and pornographic slanders.

    • Thanks: JPS
    • Replies: @Redpill Boomer
  19. Reagan was just another boomer libtard, guided by false principles and a fundamental misunderstanding of the world. They are all like that. It’s so funny that the “badass” avatar of boomer conservatism is a gigantic shitlib.

    • Agree: A_Hand_Hidden
    • Replies: @Anonymous
  20. @HT

    Well, we do know what one group of people is fond of assassination, and they often work hand-in-hand with the CIA. The attempt to install CIA puppet Bush may have failed, but Reagan seemed to have gotten the message.

  21. Voltarde says:

    As a term of derision, those whom we now generically refer to as “Boomers” were more commonly called “Yuppies” (“Young Urban Professionals”) after, say, the mid-1970s. This was in contrast to the 1960s term “Hippie.”

    It’s more accurate to say that it was the “Yuppies” who were responsible for screwing over subsequent generations. Many Boomers were themselves screwed over by the post-1975 Yuppie Ascendancy. It was the triumphant Yuppies themselves who made sure to retire the term “Yuppie” in public discourse in favor of the more generic “Boomer,” i.e., as a way to deflect any focus on the role of Yuppies as the core of the UniParty.

    If you want to understand American politics in general, and the rise of Reagan in particular, read Whitney Webb’s two-volume “One Nation Under Blackmail.” Highly recommended. The first volume describes Reagan’s background with Lew Wasserman, Music Corporation of America (MCA), and organized crime.

    • Agree: SteveK9
    • Replies: @JPS
    , @JPS
    , @Redpill Boomer
    , @Linus
  22. Well, yes. Conservatism was always about controlling the formation of any actual right-wing party. It is not surprising that Reagan was for immigration.

  23. @JPS

    Oh, sorry. I was counting the children of those 3 million, should have been more clear.

    • Disagree: JPS
    • LOL: don't care
    • Replies: @JPS
  24. Reagan is correct here. American identity is imparted by the act of submission to the American state in a way that isn’t true for most other national identities. If the German government suddenly disappeared, a German would still be a German, but if the US government suddenly disappeared, then “American” as a national identity group would disappear with it. That’s why trying to use things like “American nationalism” or “make America great again” as proxies for white racial politics was always a stupid idea and has been such an abysmal failure.

  25. The Jewnited Sodomite States of Isramerica brings demonoracy to the world ONE BOMB AT A TIME.

    • Agree: Anonymous534
  26. @don't care

    Reagan was a Hollywood actor, which means there’s a 99% chance he sucked some Jew’s micropenis for roles, along with engaging in other deviant behavior. The “casting couch” applied to both men and women.

    • Replies: @Midwest peasant
  27. JPS says:
    @A_Hand_Hidden

    They’ve increased 10-fold since 1986?

    You should be sorry.

    As bad as it was, amnesty for a few million in the mid-80s on the basis of a false promise to control the border would not have seemed like a race replacement agenda as what happened during Biden’s last term.

    I don’t excuse Reagan for his faults, but I’m suspicious of the motives of those who blow what he did out of proportion. The country was still overwhelmingly white in the 80s in most places.

    Let’s see what Trump does in the next few years.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @eah
    , @Greta Handel
  28. Pythas says:
    @Rich

    I love anti-white whites. Its the gift that keeps on giving now. Also if Reagan actually thought that then we know why America is a 3rd world shithole now…

    • Replies: @JunkyardDog
  29. @HT

    Ronald Raygun was supported by the jewish Mafia
    in California and they helped him for example to
    become President of the Actors Guild.
    There are similarities between Reagan and Trump.
    They both are third rate actors but very charismatic.
    They both are crypto liberals and Zionists.
    They are experts at deceiving and betraying
    their followers.
    They are both traitors to the white race.

    • Replies: @Tucker
  30. JPS says:
    @Voltarde

    They’ve been talking about “the baby boom generation” since I was born, as long as I remember. Yuppies were just the upscale version, you know, the people who don’t want to take a hay ride, and own a Macintosh computer.

    https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=baby+boom+generation&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=en-2019&smoothing=0

  31. Pythas says:

    Diversity is our strength! A ssa-nigger rapes girl in Spain. The Spanish won’t put up with this bullshit like the anglo kucks…

  32. Jimmy Carter opened the door on immigration, Reagan kicked the sum bitch wide open then slick Willy came in and sent all the manufacturing overseas then W brought on the Wolfiwitz doctrine and bam, the choosers are in total control.

  33. JPS says:
    @Voltarde

    When I see simpering and nasty remarks about Reagan, there are generally three possibilities. 1) The person is some sort of kike or commie – a good probability on a site like this 2) The person isn’t old enough to remember any of the substance of Reagan’s administration and is going by some of his material that didn’t age well 3) There’s the off-chance the person is a hard-core old time WN with a level psychopathy to boot. A venerable breed, to be sure, not liable to be posting here too much.

    I don’t expect people to fawn over Reagan like it’s 2004, but the extreme nastiness about Reagan comes from people who were boomer shitlib faggots at the time or who are kikes now.

    https://twitter.com/IvanIvanovichC2/status/1912180077548179478/photo/1

  34. @JPS

    Reagan was a Jewish astroturfed fake just like Trump. What will it take for people to understand the trick? Get this through your thick boomer skull!

    THEY PLAY BOTH SIDES!

    Jews on the right get America into war and privatize the economy into Jewish hands.

    Jews on the left push anti-white hatred and blame the things right wing Jews are responsible for on whites.

  35. arnieus says:

    Reagan was an “acting president” controlled by the Bush crime clan.

  36. @Pierre de Craon

    Yes! Reagan was a mixed bag whose turncoat antics harmed our side, yet he provided true Americans with newfound pride and hope, which is worth more than anything. No doubt that’s why the Marxoids hated him so much.

    • Thanks: JPS
  37. @Voltarde

    I’m a boomer but I was never a yuppie. I was a redneck hippie libertarian for that entire time period.

  38. Based speech.

    Does it check all the boxes? Let’s see.

    “You can go to France but cannot become a Frenchman.” Check!

    “You can go to Germany….but you cannot become a German.” Check!

    Reagan was clearly in favor of European countries preserving their European heritage.

    Try again, (((Anglin)))

    We know your agenda

  39. Anonymous[350] • Disclaimer says:
    @JPS

    They’ve increased 10-fold since 1986?

    you know how fast mexicans breed

    • Replies: @JPS
  40. It is always very interesting when someone supposedly so knowledgeable about American politics still doesn’t understand that the Republican party literally started as an anti-white extremist organization trying to flood America’s streets with freed niggers.

  41. Tucker says:
    @JudeoSatanism

    “They are both traitors to the white race.”

    https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=64976

    Trump Announces He’s Working on Mass Amnesty Plan for Illegal Aliens After Passing ‘Big Beautiful Bill’

    Chris Menahan InformationLiberation Jul. 04, 2025

    “In his first speech after the House passed his “Big Beautiful Bill,” President Trump on Thursday announced he’s working on a mass amnesty for potentially millions of illegal aliens working in farm, hotel and leisure industries which “radical right people” won’t be happy about.”

    In an earlier comment, right around the time the Orange Con Man was sworn in, I predicted that this guy would spend the next four years stabbing the pro-MAGA, pro-America First, racially healthy White voters who voted for him in the back. I predicted that this guy was fully on board with the White Race Replacement Agenda of we all know who, which anyone with half a brain should have realized after he accepted $100,000,000 dollars from Miriam Adelson and $230, 473, 622 from the White race hating AIPAC group.

    That $330,473, 622 in donations had strings attached. Continuing dragging the US into wars in the Middle East was one string. Of equal or even greater importance, was to drop any attempt to undue the treasonous and anti-White agendas that were launched by the authors of that 1965 Hart-Celler (White Race Replacement) legislation.

    I predicted it before, and I will double down on my prediction. By the time this lying, base backstabbing, base betraying Orange Con Man leaves office – he will be viscerally hated and despised by the overwhelming majority of the White people who voted for him.

    I’m already at that point.

  42. The Republican Party had not yet discovered what a wonderful distraction immigration would make. Thank goodness for advertising agencies and focus groups. Raygun’s legacy was neutering the free press so this crap could be broadcast to advantage by his successors.

    It is utterly bizarre to hear descendants of Irish Catholics (and others), who were so passionately hated by white Americans back in the day, now pissing and moaning about immigrants who do not belong in “our” culture.

    • Replies: @SteveK9
    , @Rich
  43. eah says:
    @JPS

    It’s not just what he did (his amnesty Merkel-ed the GOP), which was bad enough — it’s the simple-minded race flat earth mindset, the boomer-esque ‘proposition nation’ bullshit — despite what was already in Reagan’s day vast evidence of racial differences (The Bell Curve was published in 1994), similar (non-)thinking has permeated the ‘conservative’ establishment, and is exactly why today Maine and Minnesota have more immigrants from Somalia than any other country, as well as why for the last twenty years or so, the US has taken in more refugees from the Democratic Republic of Congo, home to some of the lowest quality human capital on the planet, than anywhere else.

    And Trump espouses the same ‘as long as they come legally’ nonsense — he is on record during the campaign saying ‘I’m not a radical at all, we’re gonna let a lot of people in’, and promised to staple a green card to the diploma of every foreigner who graduates from a post-secondary school in the US.

    You fucking moron.

    • Replies: @Same old same old
    , @JPS
  44. @Anonymous

    There was no political movement associated with the WW II baby boomers in general. It was only the small fraction on the left, conspicuously led by leftist university professors, that was burning everything down. Behind the scenes this war on American society was secretly being orchestrated by the CIA, funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, and formulated in the University of Chicago, as a few examples. The 1960s hippies were loathed by normal teenagers of the era, although no one at the time, including the hippies imagining they were “doing their own thing,” had a clue that the biggest pusher of drugs and “free love” was the US government itself and the monied elites that owned it then and still own it today.

    Arguing that diversity is a culture’s strength is like saying the best car is made by forcing together incompatible parts from different manufacturers—it doesn’t run well, if at all, and its break down is guaranteed. Diversity, of course, is the straightforward antithesis of culture. At the time Reagan spoke those words, however, there was a discernible America, not held together by liberty, as he claimed, but, quite the opposite, it was held together by the Christian religion. That had to go, replacing religion with government as supreme authority in all things, in turn owned by the elites. That’s why they support communism, because the state owns everything and they own the state. Although it seems incongruous, it’s why they’re the biggest supporters of the left and today’s Bolsheviks, aka the Deep State.

    As an aside, up until 1947 the Supreme Court held in every case bearing on religion that it was the bedrock underlying America’s social comity and success—and well into the late 1960s you could mostly feel safe from one end of this country to the other. People did not have to lock their cars or front doors. It was at that time, however, in a dissenting opinion, that Justice Felix Frankfurter wrote that not only was religion not the highest societal good, it was the source of, literally, all violence and civil strife. Thereafter, in every decision bearing on religion, the Supreme Court—essentially an anti-Christian, Masonic Sanhedrin at that time—followed Frankfurter’s instructions to the letter, effectively legislating from the bench (what it does best) that religion, and now meaning only Christianity, was the chief source of strife and had to be suppressed for it. Just recently, the private correspondence between Frankfurter and Louis Brandeis was published, proving that these two prominent Jews speaking for Jews—which is the only reason they were appointed to the Supreme Court—were planning the overthrow of the American way of life as far back as the late 1920s.

  45. SteveK9 says:
    @Observator

    Eventually Irish Catholics joined American culture (for the most part). Current immigrants might have done the same, but there are too many of them, so it isn’t happening. Or, at least it is happening very slowly. Also, white Europeans (even Irish Catholics) are superior to immigrants from Haiti, Jamaica, N. Africa, and the bottom of the barrel immigrants from Central America.

    • Replies: @Midwest peasant
  46. Piglet says:
    @Rich

    Reagan also put an end to direct flights between the USA and South Africa as a way of putting pressure on the white RSA government. Mostly it was annoying symbolism and an added expense because you could still fly to the RSA but you’d have to fly first to a different country and then fly to the RSA from there. That was in 1986 and I remember it well because I was about to fly there.

    Thanks a lot, Ronnie.

    • Thanks: JunkyardDog, Rich
  47. eah says:

    William Gayley Simpson, author of Which Way Western Man?, was born in 1892 — Reagan was born in 1911 — Simpson had inklings of the spiritual rot that was beginning to hollow out Western civilization during the time Reagan was maturing and entering adulthood — so in many ways, Reagan is a product of this spiritual rot, which is perhaps best characterized as egalitarianism: both racial egalitarianism, the inane idea that all races are essentially equal in their characteristics and potential, as well as gender equality — they are equally pernicious dogmas that are today secular moral imperatives, despite being counter to known facts and common sense.

    You can find links (including AI audio) to Revilo Oliver’s excellent review of Which Way Western Man? in this earlier comment.

    • Thanks: europeasant
  48. @Pythas

    In a libertarian free-for-all, here euphemistically being called liberty, the liberty to do your own thing so long as you don’t harm others is the highest good. Society, however, demands social cohesion, not its fragmentation, which in the latter case is what Reagan’s open-door policy entailed. All you have to do to become a “good” American is want to be left alone to do your own thing. Unfortunately, this hasn’t worked out to everyone’s satisfaction.

    The secret behind Mises’s libertarianism is that, once society and its economic activity are unrestrained by Christian ethics and the people atomized as individuals suppposedly maximizing their personal well-being, successful predation by highly organized ethnic predators is guaranteed. The proof is in the pudding with the conspicuous rise of an ethnic group noted for collusion, who are now among the richest of the one-tenth of one percent who own something like half the wealth in America, or whatever it is. These people, whomever they are (har har), should be tarred, feathered, and sent packing, not handed the keys to the government by one president after the other regardless of party.

  49. Rich says:
    @Observator

    Yeah Irish Catholics are the problem. Or is it those damn Frenchies in Maine and Massachusetts? What about those Germans in Pennsylvania? What is it, do you have a darkie somewhere in the woodpile? DNA test come back showing 8% colored? When America was segregated, White communities lived relatively crime-free lives. Kids played in the street and could go to school in peace. Letting the Irish, Eastern and Southern Europeans in saved the country. Blacks woukd be 40-50% of the population if not for all those Catholics coming in and having ten kids, then intermarrying with the original settlers.

  50. Sparkon says:
    @JPS

    You had to be a kid in the 80s.

    Somebow I think the adults of the ’80s had a better grasp on reality than the kids and TV tots of that decade, which seemingly continues right up to the present, but I see you and a few of your fellow, ignorant Boomer Bashers are out to defend Ronald Reagan, and that’s about all it takes for this Baby Boomer to repeat my lesson about the guy Conservatives and their ilk once loved to call “The Great Communicator,” but whom I like to call “Ol’ Red Foggy Top.”

    You see, according to writer Howard Fast, in 1938, young actor Ronald Reagan had tried to join the Hollywood Communist Party.

    Let that sink in for a second or two, but the good news is the Reds decided to reject Reagan because, in their words, he was a “feather brain.” In modern parlance, they’d probably call him an airhead.

    According to Fast:

    “Word came back he was a flake … who couldn’t be trusted with a political opinion for 20 minutes,” he says.

    Fast says the party sent Reagan a delegation that “convinced him he could do more for the various causes the party represented in Hollywood as an outsider, as a friend of the party, than as a member.”

    “It took hours to talk him out of it.”

    https://nypost.com/1999/09/26/commies-rated-ron-too-dim-to-be-a-red-star-buddy-says-reagan-was-rejected-by-the-party/

    A “friend of the Party” – imagine that.

    In addition to being a “feather brain,” Reagan was also plagued with poor eyesight and poor hearing, but he was a well-built man standing 6’1″, who was quite glib and very handsome.

    [Imaginary risque late night 1980s TV dialogue]

    Ed: How handsome was he?

    Johnny: He was so handsome that almost every beautiful actress in Tinsel Town was eagerly hopping into bed with him. Reagan liked to brag about the expensive rubbers he used.

    After wife Jane Wyman left him for boring her to tears, Reagan took up residence in a notorious Hollywood hotel known as The Garden of Allah.

    “A series of women passed through Ronald Reagan’s bedroom in those years,” celebrity biographer Kitty Kelley wrote, “so many, in fact, that he later told Joe Santley, a publicist, that he once found himself in the Garden of Allah Hotel with a woman he didn’t know. ‘I woke up one morning and I couldn’t remember the name of the gal I was in bed with. I said, ‘Hey, I gotta get a grip here.’”

    https://www.westhollywoodhistory.org/the-garden-of-allah/6-kismet/gotta-get-a-grip/

    Well, I can’t really fault Ron Reagan for getting all that beautiful pussy while he could. Of course that assumes all of his partners were willing, but at least one claims she wasn’t, and Ron simply overpowered her while demonstrating, I suppose, that he really did have some right-wing roots, despite the Red infatuation.

    But is there any evidence he might have been working as “a friend of the Party?”

    Nancy Reagan … often explained that she and the future president met cute. She had been threatened with blacklisting in the early ’50s—by mistake, she said, after having been confused with another actress who had the same name—Nancy Davis. The other Nancy Davis, Nancy and Ronald Reagan said, really was a Communist. Reagan, then president of the Screen Actors Guild, helped the first Nancy prove she wasn’t the Communist Nancy Davis, and she was able to work again. Along the way, they fell in love, and the rest is history.

    In 1987, I found the other Nancy Davis working at a snack bar in Ventura, California, and interviewed her for The Nation. When I asked about the first lady, she said,

    “She’s been lying about me for years…. I never was a Communist. I told Reagan back in the fifties that if she didn’t stop saying I was a Communist, I’d sue her.”

    https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/nancy-reagan-and-the-problem-of-the-two-nancys/

    By now we should recognize that the lie, especially the Big Lie, is a reliable tool for all the right-wingers who lie, lie and lie some more to get what they want.

    Of course, during his two terms of office, Pres. Ronald Reagan managed to triple the national debt, turning what was once the world’s largest creditor nation into the world’s largest debtor nation, while presiding over a period of downsizing, outsourcing and offshoring that, coincidentally or not, took place just as China was opening its doors to foreign investment under Premier Deng’s Four Modernizations with the establishment of new Special Economic Zones in once-sleepy backwaters like Shenzhen, whose population was 30,000 in 1980, but had grown to 17 million by 2020 while earning a reputation as the world’s largest electronics marketplace. Many of the electronic gadgets on your desk and mine probably were manufactured in Shenzhen.

    I guess a real “friend of the Party” could have done a better job of wrecking American industry and burdening the economy with a millstone of debt than Pres. Ronald Reagan did, but I don’t know how.

    • Replies: @JPS
  51. Anonymous[151] • Disclaimer says:
    @Godly3347683

    The Baby Boomer who was born in 1911? Good argument.

  52. The 1970s oil embargoes, the hyper inflation, the collapsing of traditional industries. Classic companies like Harley Davidson almost going to the wall because bad management and years of no investment.

    The 1980s was the rise of the service sector, how people made money off others by grifting and gouging..

  53. Linus says:
    @JPS

    Nah, Andy is right – Reagan is boomer-tier. When he was in office, Gen Xers were just kids, and most of us didn’t like Reagan. Gen X really came of age in Bush II and Iraq war. Boomers love Reagan, endlessly want to ‘go back’ to him.

  54. Linus says:
    @Voltarde

    When the yuppies first arose, they were interpreted as hippies-gone-corporate. That is, the story was one of both success and hypocrisy. In their youth, they were druggies and hipsters, free love and lots of weed and LSD. Then they grew up, most married and got awesome jobs, and became yuppies. Essentially, they switched from being socially-liberal-anti-capitalist to being economic-liberals-pro-capitalist – but they never stopped being liberals. The hippie-to-yuppie pipeline just highlighted the fact that liberalism always wins, and the left-right thing is fake.

  55. @Hulkamania

    Reagan’s only son became a ballet dancer, is there anything more to say on that !?
    Garden of Allah sounds so ghey bathhouse its quite funny.
    He also lived with a dude for a period. my guess is the alleged womanizing is a PR cover (like a lot of Hollywood marriages are for the deviants there.), same as Bill Clintons was.

    GHWB’s son George was a high school male cheerleader then a college cheerleader. it seems to be a qualification for high office.

  56. @SteveK9

    The advantages of limited and qualified immigration is that the best come here. people with intelligence and skills.

    Opening the doors to millions of low IQ scum is just going to produce ‘Idiocracy’, which is happening now, women thinking the’re superior despite the evidence, AI and expert systems helping the dumb do important jobs badly.

    The book the Bell Curve is big on the dumbing down of society due to importing low IQ masses and artificial selection for the really stupid…

    • Replies: @Same old same old
  57. Boy, was Reagan wrong.

    Today, anyone can become a German or Frenchman. And soon, anyone will be Japanese as Japanese don’t breed and their country fills up with foreigners, or New Japanese.

    • Replies: @Same old same old
  58. @eah

    Don’t forget Dump’s genius justification: we need more people because of AI.

    Donny would be saying we need horse trainers because of the Model T if he had been alive.

  59. @Midwest peasant

    The advantages of limited and qualified immigration is that the best come here. people with intelligence and skills.

    We should be focused on making our own people the best, not importing the “best” from elsewhere.

  60. @JPS

    I don’t excuse Reagan for his faults

    Your statements above are precisely that.

    The Establishment has never sent anyone to rescue you from itself. The purpose of politics is to keep sheep voting (and, between Most Important Elections Ever, commenting) at each other while they’re turned into sweaters and chops. For example:

    Not sure why the Air Traffic Controllers going on strike is supposed to be something that needs to be tolerated by a Republican President.

  61. Anonymous[318] • Disclaimer says:

    Right again. When statist assholes talk about America, it’s an abstraction like transuent causation or the square root of -1. America is the property common to all the things floating through your head when you make the America face. Hot dogs, baseball, apple pie and Chevrolet. Tits. Beer. Teen porn. Your phone. It’s why you have to submit to arbitrary detention camps in swamps, continual surveillance by psycho Jews in bunkers, medical experimentation, debanking, germ warfare, groveling for cops, and censorship.

  62. JPS says:
    @Anonymous

    you know how fast mexicans breed

    Yeah, the short answer is, you were WRONG by a factor of ten on the number, and don’t like admitting having your shitheel foot in your mouth.

    Why these people need to exaggerate the extent of the amnesty, as if to cover for what the Democrats have done and place the blame back on Reagan?

    The motives are always suspicious. I don’t expect people to like or admire Reagan, excessive admiration is certainly unwarranted, but I find the exaggerated attacks on him suspicious. Sort of the way you learn that when somebody says “Republican don’t care about abortion” (which was certainly true about the Bushes, and in general) it’s often a sign that they support abortion. One discerns the motives from their peculiar emphasis.

    You sound like an abortion supporter, it’s very stereotypical boomer take to secretly hate Reagan over his appeals to pro-life support, an exaggerated hatred for Mexican families (probably because some might be Catholic). “Thirty Million Mexicans” amnestied (a ten fold exaggeration), but no discussion of the context, or other provisions passed by the law.

  63. JPS says:
    @Sparkon

    Boomer recites Kitty Kelly tier factoids.

    It never gets old for these fools.

    • Replies: @Sparkon
  64. JPS says:
    @eah

    the ‘conservative’ establishment, and is exactly why today Maine and Minnesota have more immigrants from Somalia than any other country, as well as why for the last twenty years or so, the US has taken in more refugees from the Democratic Republic of Congo, home to some of the lowest quality human capital on the planet, than anywhere else.

    Maine and Minnesota are controlled by the Democratic Party.

    Ronald Reagan didn’t destroy the Republican Party by giving an amnesty to approximately 3 million people. Ill-advised, bad decision, despite the fact that the agreement included provisions that would have, if enforced, reduced illegal immigration. His Cold War promotion of the idea of America as the promised land of Freedom seems misguided in retrospect, however, at the time, it would not have seemed to the typical American that things were going to get so rapidly bad.

    I’m very suspicious of anybody excessively knocking Reagan, given the conditions he was working under. He was certainly superior to the Bushes.

    Of course, anyone justifying the attack on Russia’s strategic bombers, as if it wasn’t a useless nuclear provocation, is a guaranteed Fed or just a hopeless fool.

    • Replies: @Rich
  65. Sparkon says:
    @JPS

    Nice try mischaracterizing (lying about) my comment, but the articles I cited were written by Howard Fast, Jon Wiener, and Jon Ponder, who did mention Kelly, but Wiener’s article in The Nation exposes the fact that Ronald and Nancy Reagan lied about “the other Nancy Davis.” for years in order to cover up Nancy Reagan’s Red past.

    And Pres. Ron Reagan did triple the national debt while turning the United States into the world’s largest debtor nation, opened the door for illegal aliens, presided over the treasonous Iran-Contra affair, while concealing his own and his wife’s Red background, so why not address some of that instead replying with a deceitful dodge and airhead-grade cheap shots?

  66. eah says:

    I’m not particularly interested in bashing Reagan (whom I personally disliked) as an individual, which is why I pointed out that his mindset (race flat earth-ism, America as proposition nation, etc) is entirely typical of the GOP as a whole.

    And I don’t think party affiliation has mattered much, e.g. look into which party has controlled the presidency and Congress most of the time since 1980 (hint: it’s not the Democrats) — also the top ten states for refugee resettlement (which seeded MN and ME with Somalis) over the last couple of decades seem pretty evenly split between red and blue, with a solidly red state, Texas, accepting the most.

  67. Rich says:
    @JPS

    Reagan was better than Carter and Mondale, his opponents in his presidential campaigns’ but he failed to return the country to conservatism or to accomplish most of his campaign promises. Until 1986 he had a majority in the Senate and although he didn’t have a majority in the House’ there were still some Southern democrats who could be counted on for support. During his term he appointed an affirmative action Supreme Court justice, signed Martin King day, raised the debt, allowed amnesty for illegals, failed to eliminate any federal agencies, increased the size of the federal workforce by 500k, sent 241 soldiers and marines to their deaths in Lebanon and promoted the moron Colin Powell well above his abilities, among many other blunders. Had he acted on his supposed conservative values, he might have saved the country.

  68. @Priss Factor

    And soon, anyone will be Japanese as Japanese don’t breed and their country fills up with foreigners, or New Japanese.

    A smaller population is not the problem. The problem is when Jews exploit that population decline as an excuse to import foreign “labor” to fill the supposed gap.

    In an age of ever-increasing automation, to the point that practically any job can be potentially automated with enough up-front cost, that excuse falls flat on its face. Yet, that is the very excuse the Republicans keep employing.

    • Replies: @Martine.S
  69. Chaskinss says:

    Never was a “country”, simply, a corrupt and imperialistic, genocidal business enterprise. The “immigrants” were and are mainly grifters, hustlers, and hucksters.

  70. Martine.S says:
    @Same old same old

    They exploit it because their real agenda is to race mix away the host population – which is the entire White race of Europe, USA, Canada, Australia. And increasingly they are targeting Japan and South Korea, as they are also intelligent and thus a potential threat to Kike world rule.

  71. @JPS

    Reagan is more of a Gen X “saint” than a Boomer saint.

    Gen X’er here. No, Señor, Reagan is not a saint.

    “San Adolfo, ruega por nosotros.”

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Andrew Anglin Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World